Is amazon as bad as walmart when it comes to employees on snap and medicaid?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available federal and reporting data show Walmart has repeatedly appeared as one of the largest single employers of workers on SNAP and Medicaid across multiple state reports and GAO-sourced analyses, while Amazon also appears on those lists but with smaller counts in most cited datasets; the GAO-based reporting cited Walmart with about 14,500 SNAP recipients and roughly 10,350 Medicaid enrollees in the states studied [1] [2]. Opinion and commentary pieces frame both companies as benefiting from public subsidies when their low wages push employees onto public programs, with some state-level reports showing Amazon leading in particular states like Nevada for Medicaid enrollments [3] [4].
1. Why this question matters: public costs, private profits
The debate is about who carries the cost of low wages: taxpayers through Medicaid and SNAP, or corporations through higher pay and benefits. Analysis and commentary argue that profitable firms—from Walmart to Amazon—are among the largest employers of program recipients, which critics call a “hidden subsidy” that socializes labor costs [3] [1].
2. What the government data actually showed
The nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) data summarized in reporting found Walmart was in the top four employers of Medicaid and SNAP beneficiaries in each participating agency and that, across nine states reporting SNAP data, Walmart employed about 14,541 SNAP recipients; across six states reporting Medicaid data Walmart had about 10,350 enrollees tied to its workforce [1] [2]. Other large employers on those lists included McDonald’s, Dollar stores, Target and Amazon — Amazon appeared but with smaller totals in the GAO tabulations cited [2] [5].
3. Where Amazon differs — geography and firm type
Reporting and follow-ups show Amazon can lead in specific states or locales for Medicaid enrollments — for example, state reporting cited in commentary places Amazon first in Nevada with thousands of Medicaid-covered employees and dependents [3] [4]. But broader GAO-driven coverage places Walmart and fast-food/retail chains consistently higher across the multi-state samples cited [1] [2].
4. Numbers don’t equal intent — scale and sector explain part of it
Walmart is the nation’s largest private employer and largest retailer; several sources note its high counts of Medicaid/SNAP users reflect scale as well as wages and scheduling practices [5] [1]. Advocates and journalists nevertheless emphasize that being large is not a full excuse: critics argue that profitable firms should pay enough to reduce reliance on public assistance, a point advanced in commentary calling the situation “corporate welfare” [3] [6].
5. Corporate responses and counterarguments
Companies and some defenders argue that their presence on lists of employers with many program enrollees is a function of size and the industries they operate in; Walmart has said its employment access provides opportunities that would otherwise not exist [5]. Reporting also documents companies touting wage increases and benefits as part of their response, which complicates a simple “worse/better” ranking [3].
6. Programs and perks directed at beneficiaries — retail strategy
Retailers have increasingly tailored services for customers on public programs: Walmart’s Walmart+ Assist gives discounted memberships to those who qualify for SNAP, Medicaid and other programs; outlets report Amazon and Kroger have also rolled out or expanded perks for SNAP/EBT users in consumer-facing programs [7] [8]. These moves position retailers to serve low-income shoppers while also shaping how the costs and benefits of serving that population are discussed publicly [7] [8].
7. Limitations and missing pieces in the available reporting
Available sources draw on GAO and state agency snapshots covering specific states and months; they do not provide a full nationwide, company-by-company accounting or causal proof that employer pay practices are the sole driver of program enrollment [1] [2]. Available sources do not mention comprehensive, up-to-date national totals comparing Amazon and Walmart across all states for 2024–2025, nor do they quantify how much public spending is attributable solely to each employer beyond the state snapshots [3] [4].
8. Bottom line for your question
In the datasets and reporting provided, Walmart shows higher absolute counts of employees on SNAP and Medicaid across the sampled states and agencies; Amazon appears on the lists but typically with lower counts except in certain states where it leads for Medicaid enrollees [1] [3]. The policy argument is contested: critics say both firms benefit from taxpayer subsidies when workers rely on public programs, while companies point to scale, hiring access, and incremental wage improvements as counterpoints [3] [5].