Is there an ice processing center being built in Merrimack New Hampshire?

Checked on January 29, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Reporting indicates that internal ICE draft documents identified Merrimack, New Hampshire, as a proposed site to convert a former industrial warehouse into a temporary “processing” facility with capacity between 500 and 1,500 detainees, but federal officials have not confirmed a finalized plan and local leaders say they were blindsided by the reporting [1] [2]. Community protests, town council opposition and active local reporting have followed the Washington Post disclosure, yet as of the available reporting there is no public federal announcement that construction or an operational ICE processing center is underway in Merrimack [3] [4].

1. What the leaked plan says and how Merrimack shows up in it

A Washington Post-obtained draft calls for a national network of renovated warehouses including 16 smaller “processing” sites and several larger detention warehouses, and it names a former industrial building in Merrimack as the New England candidate for one of the smaller sites that could hold 500 to 1,500 detainees [1] [2]. The draft frames these processing sites as temporary holding facilities where detainees would be staged for transfer to larger detention centers that would hold thousands more as part of an overall design to accommodate up to 80,000 people at once, according to the reporting [1] [5].

2. Federal response — no confirmation, draft language

When asked about the reporting, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told the Washington Post she “cannot confirm” the reporting and declined to discuss details, and ICE/Boston field office representatives did not publicly confirm plans in regional inquiries, leaving the proposal categorized in local reporting as a draft rather than a finalized federal project [1] [5]. Other federal statements circulated in the coverage emphasized no new detention centers were being announced “at this time,” signaling the administration’s reluctance to treat the leaked documents as settled policy [6].

3. Local officials and political reaction — surprise and opposition

Merrimack’s town manager and other local officials said they were surprised to learn of the plans through media reports rather than direct federal consultation, and the town council formally sent letters opposing an ICE processing facility, citing concerns about town services and public safety burdens, according to local reporting [2] [4]. The disclosure prompted hundreds of protesters at town meetings and public statements from state and local politicians pledging opposition or seeking formal consultation before any project proceeds [3] [7].

4. Documents and on-the-ground sleuthing — addresses and verification efforts

Local journalists and community members circulated a document that pointed to a specific Merrimack address as the proposed site and several outlets published or identified that same building, prompting residents to watch the property and town police to monitor it, though the town continued to seek verification from state and federal officials about the document’s authenticity [8] [6]. Independent and local news outlets reported that the address circulated — 50 Robert Milligan Parkway in coverage — has become a focal point of scrutiny while official confirmation remained absent [6] [9].

5. What is established versus what remains unknown

What is established in existing reporting is that a draft ICE plan identified Merrimack as a potential processing site and that the disclosure generated immediate local alarm and political pushback [1] [10]. What remains unknown in the public record provided is whether any contracts have been signed, whether renovations or construction have begun, or whether the administration has formally approved and scheduled the site to be built and operated; federal officials cited in the reporting would not confirm such details [1] [6].

6. Bottom line for the question “Is there an ICE processing center being built in Merrimack?”

There is documented reporting that ICE draft plans proposed converting a Merrimack warehouse into a processing site and local documents and reporting have identified a candidate building, but there is no public federal confirmation or reporting of construction or formal establishment of an operational ICE processing center in Merrimack as of the sources available; the matter remains a proposed/draft plan under public and local scrutiny [1] [5] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
Which federal approvals and contracting steps are required before ICE can convert a private warehouse into a detention or processing facility?
What legal and municipal processes can a New Hampshire town use to challenge or block a proposed federal detention facility in its borders?
How have other communities responded when leaked ICE facility plans surfaced, and what were the outcomes?