How do 2026 federal pay increases affect GS locality pay adjustments?

Checked on December 17, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

The White House's 2026 pay proposal would give most General Schedule (GS) employees a 1.0% across‑the‑board base pay increase while explicitly freezing locality pay rates at their 2025 levels, meaning locality percentages would not add to that raise [1] [2] [3]. Certain federal law enforcement officers (LEOs) would receive larger adjustments — a total 3.8% increase through special rate authority — but they also would not get increased locality percentages beyond 2025 rates [1] [4].

1. What the proposal changes: base pay up, locality frozen

The administration’s 2026 alternative pay plan calls for a modest 1.0% increase to GS base pay while leaving locality pay percentages at 2025 levels; numerous reporting and employer‑focused sites summarize that outcome as a base raise without any locality bump for 2026 [1] [2] [3]. That means employees’ base pay lines on the GS table rise by 1.0%, but the geographic adjustment — the locality percentage added to that base — would remain unchanged from the prior year [2] [3].

2. Why locality pay matters to take‑home pay

Locality pay is a geographic percentage applied to GS base pay to reflect non‑federal pay levels in an area; historically it has been a significant portion of total GS compensation in high‑cost localities such as New York or the D.C. area [5]. Freezing locality percentages effectively reduces the total raise many employees expect because only the base increases while the locality multiplier remains static, so people in high‑locality areas feel the freeze more in dollar terms than employees in Rest‑of‑U.S. [5] [6].

3. Who benefits despite the freeze: law enforcement and special rates

The plan carves out a separate treatment for certain federal law enforcement officers, whose total adjustment is presented as 3.8% via the use of special salary rate authority and other mechanisms; outlets note LEOs will receive the larger increase even as locality percentages are frozen [1] [4]. Agencies also can use special rates or targeted recruitment/retention adjustments in specific occupations or localities, subject to statutory caps and OPM authority, which can create exceptions to the frozen locality effect [5] [3].

4. How the mechanics change an employee’s pay calculation

Under normal annual practice the GS base is increased and then locality is applied as a percentage of that base; with a frozen locality the formula still applies but uses the prior year’s locality percentage, so the effective percentage increase on total pay for many employees will be less than 1.0% + prior locality growth would have implied [5] [2]. Analysts and calculators provided by pay‑focused sites model the outcomes: a $60,000 GS salary with a 1% base boost becomes $60,600 before locality, and then locality is calculated using the unchanged 2025 percentage, not a higher 2026 percentage [7] [2].

5. The competing policy rationales in coverage

Supporters of the freeze frame it as fiscal restraint and alignment with the administration’s budgetary priorities, emphasizing targeted boosts for hard‑to‑staff law enforcement roles [1] [8]. Critics and labor‑oriented commentators point out that a locality freeze erodes purchasing power in high‑cost areas and that without locality increases some local pay gaps versus private sector wages remain or widen — one outlet argued locality increases “would have averaged nearly 19%” absent the freeze in some models, illustrating the degree of preexisting disparity though that particular figure is an interpretation rather than an OPM table [8] [9].

6. Legal and procedural context: how final tables get set

The President’s recommendation is advisory under 5 U.S.C. authorities and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) will publish final GS tables and any special rate notices after the pay decision is finalized and an Executive Order is issued (generally in December); several sources underscore that the published 2026 GS pay table is not final until OPM posts it [5] [3]. Congress and the President can alter the recommended figures, and agencies may implement special rates where authorized [5] [3].

7. Limitations and what reporting does not say

Available sources do not provide final OPM pay tables for 2026; coverage is based on the President’s proposal and agency recommendations, and outlets explicitly note the final figures will appear when OPM issues them [3] [2]. Detailed, locality‑by‑locality dollar impacts (beyond illustrative examples) are not provided in these summaries — readers should consult OPM’s final tables when published for precise numbers [5] [10].

8. Practical takeaway for employees and managers

For most GS employees expect a small base pay increase (1.0%) and no automatic increase in the locality percentage for 2026; check OPM’s final tables in December for exact step and locality dollars and watch agency special rate announcements if you’re in a LEO or designated recruitment/retention occupation [2] [4] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What is the timeline for 2026 federal pay raises and GS locality updates?
How will 2026 locality pay percentages differ across major U.S. metropolitan areas?
Will 2026 federal pay increases change pay retention or comparability adjustments for GS employees?
How do 2026 pay raise formulas interact with differing locality pay tables under law?
What congressional or OPM actions could alter 2026 GS locality pay before implementation?