How would subsidy eligibility and premium costs change in 2026 if the ARP/IRA enhancements expire?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
If the American Rescue Plan (ARP) and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) subsidy enhancements expire at the end of 2025, federal premium tax credit rules will revert to their pre‑2021 design on January 1, 2026: eligibility would again end at 400% of the federal poverty level (FPL) and the “applicable percentages” that determine required household contributions will rise, producing much smaller subsidies and substantially higher after‑subsidy premiums for many Marketplace enrollees [1] [2].
1. Reinstated income cap and who loses eligibility
The clearest mechanical change is that households with incomes above 400% of FPL would no longer qualify for Marketplace premium tax credits regardless of how expensive the benchmark plan is as a share of income; that temporary lift in eligibility under ARP/IRA would expire [3] [4]. Analysts and insurers flag older and near‑middle‑income households just above 400% FPL as particularly exposed — for example, a 60‑year‑old couple barely over 400% FPL could face premiums equal to a much larger share of income without the enhanced credits [5] [3].
2. Higher “applicable percentages” = smaller subsidies for those who remain eligible
Beyond outright eligibility, the formula that limits how much of income a household must pay toward the benchmark plan — the applicable percentage — will revert to higher pre‑ARP levels, meaning subsidies shrink for current recipients even if they stay below 400% FPL [6] [1]. The IRS calculations used in 2026 would require larger consumer contributions (estimates show applicable percentages rising to historically higher ranges), which directly reduces the premium tax credit amount [6].
3. Consumer bills: out‑of‑pocket premiums likely jump sharply
Multiple empirical estimates show large consumer impacts: KFF projects that average annual out‑of‑pocket premium payments for subsidized enrollees would more than double in 2026 if enhanced credits expire — a roughly 114% increase in average consumer payments in their model — and gives illustrative examples of individuals who would see several‑hundred to thousand‑dollar annual increases [7] [8]. Healthinsurance.org’s examples likewise show specific enrollee premiums rising by thousands when ARP/IRA enhancements lapse [6].
4. Insurer behavior and gross premiums: insurers expect higher rates and a sicker risk pool
Insurers’ 2026 rate filings and trackers indicate companies are already modeling scenarios where enhanced subsidies lapse: filings point to projected gross premium increases around the mid‑teens to high‑teens percentiles (median ~18% in some analyses), in part because healthier, subsidized enrollees are expected to drop coverage when subsidies fall, leaving a more costly risk pool [2] [9] [10]. The Congressional Budget Office and others also estimate that unsubsidized premiums would rise by additional percentage points if the subsidies expire [11].
5. Geographic and policy caveats — state subsidies and legislative uncertainty
The national picture masks local variation: some states already provide state‑level premium assistance or have different market dynamics, which can blunt consumer cost increases [10]. Moreover, the ultimate outcome is politically contingent — Congress could extend or modify the enhancements before 2026, and federal uncertainty has influenced filings and insurer assumptions [3] [1].
6. Winners, losers, and the politics beneath the headlines
Those most harmed would be middle‑income households above the 400% FPL cliff and older enrollees whose age‑rated premiums are high; lower‑income enrollees remain eligible for subsidies but will still face higher required contributions [5] [8]. Political agendas shape the debate: proponents of extension stress affordability and enrollment gains under ARP/IRA, while opponents focus on federal cost and long‑term fiscal tradeoffs — and insurers’ early rate filings reflect both actuarial responses and lobbying incentives to shape public support [5] [12].
7. What reporting does not settle
Available sources quantify likely premium and subsidy changes and document insurer expectations, but they cannot predict congressional action or state policy shifts after publication; if lawmakers act, the modeled 2026 outcomes would change materially [1] [3]. Where state programs offset federal rollback, impacts will deviate from national averages and the sources note those local differences without full nationwide accounting [10].