Are there trademark or corporate filings related to the name '50501' or the fiftyfifty.one site that would indicate formal brand ownership?

1. What the fiftyfifty.one site declares about ownership and structure

The fiftyfifty.one website repeatedly frames "50501" as a decentralized, people-powered campaign and states plainly that it is "not nationally incorporated" and that local events are run by independent volunteers, language that the site uses on multiple pages including their partners and events sections ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Those are first‑party statements of organizational intent and structure; they serve as contemporaneous public claims about formal status but are not themselves legal filings or registrations and therefore do not constitute proof of trademark or corporate registration in external registries ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

2. What the USPTO sources in the reporting show and do not show

The materials about the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office included in the reporting are procedural and informational—describing where filings and correspondences are sent and the USPTO’s trademarks dashboard metrics and filing pathways—but they do not include search results or entries that confirm a trademark or application for "50501" or fiftyfifty.one ^{[4] [5]}. In short, the USPTO excerpts supplied explain how trademark filings are handled generally but do not provide evidence of any filing, registration number, or serial/registration entry for the name at issue ^{[4] [5]}.

3. What formal brand ownership would look like and why it matters

Formal brand ownership typically appears as an incorporation record at a state or national registry or as a trademark application or registration in the USPTO database showing owner name, goods/services classes, and filing/registration numbers; the sources show how those processes work in a general sense ^{[4] [5]} but do not include any such recorded instance for "50501" or the fiftyfifty.one domain. The fiftyfifty.one site’s repeated assertions that the movement is unincorporated and locally organized ^{[1] [3]} are consistent with the absence of an obvious, centralized owner in the provided materials, but that is a statement of intent rather than a legal determination.

4. Limits of reporting and what was not found in these sources

The available documents do not include a USPTO trademark search, state-level corporate registry extracts, domain registration WHOIS data, or other independent filings that would definitively confirm or deny ownership; the supplied USPTO links are instructional and dashboard-oriented rather than result pages ^{[4] [5]}. Because the reporting lacks explicit search results or state incorporation records, it is not possible on the basis of these sources alone to categorically assert that no trademark or corporate filings exist anywhere; the correct, evidence-based conclusion from the provided reporting is only that no such filings or registrations are shown in these sources ^{[4] [1] [2] [3] [5]}.

5. Practical next steps to verify formal ownership

To move from reasonable inference to documentary proof would require direct searches of USPTO trademark records (using the Trademark Electronic Search System/Trademarks Dashboard), state corporate registries where an entity might incorporate, and domain registration records for fiftyfifty.one; the USPTO materials cited explain the filing mechanisms and dashboard functionality but do not substitute for a targeted search ^{[4] [5]}. Given the site’s own public claim of non‑incorporation and grassroots organization ^{[1] [2] [3]}, a prudent verification path is to run a USPTO TESS search for "50501" and look up incorporation filings in likely states, then compare any results to the movement’s public statements.

---