Was Ben Carson an employee, consultant, or board member of Neurocept LLC?

1. What the fact-checking record shows

Independent fact-checkers have repeatedly found social posts and ads that attribute medical discoveries or product endorsements to Ben Carson to be fabricated; AFP said there is “no evidence” Carson made the medical claims promoted in such headlines and that screenshots and ads are fabricated ^[1]. AFP also reported Carson is “commonly featured in ads promoting untested health products to which he has no ties,” and that a spokesman said Carson had never “developed, endorsed, or even heard” of an alleged nasal‑spray product tied to Alzheimer’s claims ^[2]. Those fact-checks directly refute claims of Carson’s involvement in specific product endorsements when the reports investigated them ^{[1] [2]}.

2. What user reviews and complaint posts claim

Customer reviews and complaint pages (for example a Trustpilot entry) allege Neurocept used “nationally recognized and trusted personalities, like Dr. Ben Carson,” and that AI was used to create the appearance Carson was involved; those posts call Neurocept a “scam” and accuse the company of using fake video endorsements ^[3]. These are user-generated assessments and raise concerns but do not constitute corporate filings or direct proof of Carson’s employment or board membership ^[3].

3. What the corporate record and reporting do not show

Available sources do not include Neurocept LLC corporate filings, board lists, employment records, or an official statement from Neurocept showing Carson as an employee, consultant, or board member. The provided materials contain no company‑level documentation linking Carson to Neurocept; thus, authoritative proof of employment or board affiliation is not found in current reporting ^{[3] [1] [2]}.

4. Carson’s broader pattern of being misattributed in ads

Reporting documents a pattern where Carson’s name and image are reused in ads for health products he did not develop. AFP’s reporting and updates cite Carson’s nonprofit responding that he had not made the medical discoveries claimed and that he has been falsely linked to such products ^{[1] [2]}. That pattern explains why consumers encountering “Ben Carson” in Neurocept marketing should be skeptical until proven by primary documents ^{[1] [2]}.

5. Conflicting types of sources and their limits

User reviews (Trustpilot, Walmart customer pages) provide firsthand consumer complaints and claims about deceptive advertising and AI-generated video, but those pieces are anecdotal and potentially unverified ^{[3] [4]}. Fact-checking journalism (AFP) investigates specific viral claims and obtains spokesperson responses; that reporting found fabrications and denials regarding products promoted with Carson’s likeness ^{[1] [2]}. Neither source set supplies a corporate roster or legal employment record for Neurocept LLC showing Carson’s status ^{[3] [1] [2]}.

6. What to look for next to resolve the question

To confirm employment/consultancy/board membership definitively you should seek: (a) Neurocept LLC corporate filings or an official company press release naming Carson; (b) a direct statement from Ben Carson’s office or his nonprofit explicitly confirming such a role; or (c) filings (SEC, state business registry) or investor materials that list advisors or board members. Those items are not present in the current reporting and thus remain the decisive evidence to obtain ^{[3] [1] [2]}.

7. Bottom line for readers

Based on the provided sources, credible fact-checkers have debunked viral health-product endorsements falsely attributed to Ben Carson and his representatives deny involvement; user complaints allege Neurocept uses fake endorsements, but no supplied source establishes Carson was an employee, consultant, or board member of Neurocept LLC ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Available sources do not mention any corporate record showing Carson held an official role with Neurocept ^{[3] [1] [2]}.