Did BlackRock play a role in any acquisitions or mergers involving Shutterfly?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
BlackRock is not documented in the provided reporting as having played a role in any acquisition or merger involving Shutterfly; the company was taken private by Apollo Global Management in a $2.7 billion deal completed in 2019, and none of the supplied BlackRock M&A items link BlackRock to that transaction [1] [2] [3] [4]. The sources show BlackRock active in its own acquisitive push across asset-management and real-estate businesses, but those deals—such as BlackRock’s purchase of ElmTree Funds—are separate from the Shutterfly/Apollo narrative in the materials provided [5] [6].
1. The clear, documented buyer of Shutterfly: Apollo Global Management
Multiple contemporaneous reports and company filings identify Apollo Global Management’s affiliates as the parties that agreed to acquire Shutterfly in an all-cash transaction valued at roughly $2.7 billion, with stockholders receiving $51 per share, and closing announced in June–September 2019 depending on the source; Apollo’s press materials and Reuters coverage set out the terms and rationale for the buyout [1] [2] [3] [4].
2. The proposed Shutterfly–Snapfish combination and private-equity consolidation context
Reporting contemporaneous to the buyout explained that Apollo intended to fold Shutterfly together with Snapfish as part of a consolidation strategy in online photo products, and trade press summarized that Apollo struck deals to acquire both businesses and planned a merger of their brands and assets—coverage that frames Shutterfly’s deal as private-equity-led consolidation rather than a BlackRock-led transaction [7] [8].
3. What the BlackRock coverage supplied here actually documents
The search results supplied document BlackRock’s distinct acquisitive activity—lists of BlackRock purchases compiled by third-party aggregators and reporting of BlackRock’s purchase of ElmTree Funds and other assets in the real-estate and infrastructure space—but these records and articles do not tie BlackRock to Shutterfly’s 2019 sale or to any Shutterfly merger discussions in the provided set of sources [5] [9] [6] [10] [11].
4. Absence of evidence is not proof of absence; limits of the supplied reporting
Within the constraints of the supplied reporting there is no citation or factual thread that places BlackRock in any advisory, equity, lending, or ownership role in the transactions that involved Shutterfly—those records consistently point to Apollo as buyer—yet the available documents do not comprehensively cover every possible investor, creditor or advisor role historically, so the absence of a BlackRock attribution in these sources is a strong negative but not an absolute impossibility beyond all other public records not provided here [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
5. Alternative explanations and where to look next
If one seeks to test whether BlackRock had an indirect connection—such as providing financing, acting as a limited partner in a fund, holding Shutterfly shares before the deal, or serving as advisor—primary sources to consult would be SEC filings, Hart‑Scott‑Rodino clearance documents, proxy statements, and transactional closing filings that list financiers and advisors; none of the supplied search results contain that granular evidence, which is why the supplied reporting points only to Apollo as the acquiror [2] [4].
6. Bottom line for readers following ownership and influence narratives
On the specific question of whether BlackRock played a role in any acquisitions or mergers involving Shutterfly, the reporting provided attributes ownership and merger activity to Apollo Global Management and related parties, and documents BlackRock’s separate M&A activity in other sectors—therefore the correct, evidence-based conclusion from these sources is that BlackRock did not play a documented role in Shutterfly’s acquisition or its Snapfish combination in the materials supplied [1] [2] [7] [6].