Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Brookfield has avoided $6.5 Billion dollars in taxes in Canada over the last 5 years.
Executive Summary
Brookfield did not clearly avoid exactly $6.5 billion in Canadian taxes over the last five years according to the documents provided; the most consistent independent estimate in the materials is $5.3 billion avoided between 2021–2024, not $6.5 billion, and other items raise questions about how avoidance is being calculated [1] [2]. Brookfield’s own tax disclosures emphasize compliance and do not corroborate a $6.5 billion figure, while a tax expert and political actors highlight large tax shortfalls and differing accounting methods that produce divergent totals [3] [4].
1. Why the $6.5 billion headline diverges from available estimates
Multiple documents in the packet converge on a $5.3 billion figure for taxes “avoided” in Canada during 2021–2024, notably from two April 4, 2025 reports that cite the same methodology and NDP calculations tied to Canadians for Tax Fairness accounting [1] [2]. The original claim of $6.5 billion is not supported by any of the supplied analyses. Discrepancies arise because advocacy groups, political offices, and reporters can use different baselines, currency conversions, and time windows, so headline numbers vary; the supplied materials show one clear alternative number [1] [2].
2. What the advocacy and political estimates actually say
The two independent reports dated April 4, 2025 that are included assert $5.3 billion CAD of avoided tax while Mark Carney served as chair, and attribute this estimate to NDP calculations which used Canadians for Tax Fairness accounting methods [1] [2]. Those reports explicitly contradict the $6.5 billion claim, and the documents state the company’s reported income and taxes paid, arriving at the $5.3 billion gap by comparing reported income to tax payments [1]. The available evidence in these items therefore supports a lower, not higher, avoided-tax figure.
3. What Brookfield’s own tax disclosures say and what they omit
Brookfield’s tax information materials included here stress compliance with statutory obligations and transparency but do not include a line-by-line reconciliation that would validate or refute an activist or political avoided-tax total [4] [5]. The company’s documents explain dividend tax treatments and general tax risk management without producing an alternative avoided-tax estimate. The absence of a detailed public reconciliation in the provided Brookfield materials leaves room for divergent outside calculations even as Brookfield asserts compliance [4] [5].
4. The tax-expert signal about zero taxes paid and its limits
A March 31, 2025 tax expert review in the materials states Brookfield paid $0 in taxes from 2022–2024 despite reporting about $1 billion in profit, implying substantial tax avoidance, but that review did not translate this into a comprehensive five-year avoided-tax total nor confirm the $6.5 billion number [3]. This expert observation flags a substantive tax shortfall in a specific period but is not itself a full accounting of the five-year Canadian tax position, so it supports concerns but does not validate the $6.5 billion headline directly [3].
5. How methodology choices change the headline number
The materials demonstrate that methodological choices—time windows, whether to measure in CAD or USD, inclusion of deferred taxes, and whether to count tax credits or jurisdictional allocation—drive large swings in avoided-tax estimates [1] [2]. The $5.3 billion figure arises from one consistent approach tied to Canadians for Tax Fairness and politically anchored analysis; the packet lacks documentation showing how a $6.5 billion outcome would be produced using those same methods and windows [1] [2]. Thus, methodological transparency is the core reason numbers diverge.
6. Political framing and potential agendas in the supplied analyses
Two documents explicitly reference political actors—an NDP estimate and Canadians for Tax Fairness accounting—indicating an advocacy and partisan dimension to the $5.3 billion claim [1] [2]. The materials include a tax expert critique that amplifies scrutiny [3]. Those agendas explain emphasis and selection of figures; while they do not prove inaccuracy, they underline why independent verification and full public reconciliations are necessary before accepting a specific headline like $6.5 billion [1] [2] [3].
7. Missing evidence that would settle the dispute
The packet lacks a comprehensive, auditable reconciliation that ties Brookfield’s reported income, taxable income allocations, credits, and jurisdiction-specific tax payments into a five‑year Canadian tax ledger. Such a reconciliation—ideally prepared by independent auditors or tax authorities with full access—would be required to move from contested estimates to a definitive number. Neither Brookfield’s public tax statements nor the advocacy analyses provided include that level of granularity [4] [1].
8. Bottom line: What can be stated with confidence today
Based on the supplied materials, it is factually supported that Brookfield was estimated to have avoided $5.3 billion CAD in Canadian taxes between 2021–2024 by NDP/Canadians for Tax Fairness accounting, and tax experts raise serious concerns about very low tax payments in recent years; the specific $6.5 billion five-year claim is not substantiated by the documents provided [1] [2] [3] [4]. Further resolution requires a detailed, authoritative tax reconciliation that is not present in these sources.