Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What specific labor abuses (child labor, forced labor, wage theft) have been alleged against Cargill in recent years and where did they occur?
Executive summary
Recent reporting and court records show repeated allegations against Cargill of child labor, forced or “slave‑like” labor, and worker‑wage harms in several countries and in its U.S. operations. Notable examples include a 2023 Brazilian labor‑court ruling ordering Cargill to pay 600,000 reais for buying cocoa from farms where child or forced labor was identified [1] [2], long‑running allegations over child slavery in West Africa that reached the U.S. Supreme Court [3] [4], and investigations tied to illegal child labor at a U.S. meatpacking plant where contractors employed minors [5].
1. Child and forced labour in Brazil’s cocoa sector — court finds supplier abuses
Brazilian labor prosecutors compiled inspections of Cargill suppliers in which children and conditions described as “slave‑like” or forced work were identified; a 39th Labor Court in Bahia ordered Cargill to pay R$600,000 as indemnity and to add contractual clauses to end relationships if such violations occur [1] [2]. Reporter Brasil and other local investigations documented incidents going back years (including rescues in 2010 and notifications in 2013) among suppliers to Cargill, and prosecutors said Cargill neglected its duty to prevent such supplier conduct [2] [6].
2. Longstanding West Africa litigation — allegations of child slavery in Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana
For decades human‑rights groups and litigants have alleged cocoa for major traders was produced with child or forced labour in Ivory Coast and Ghana. Plaintiffs claimed trafficking and child slavery on farms supplying Cargill; the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which in 2021 ruled against allowing that particular Alien Tort Statute claim to proceed because most alleged conduct occurred abroad [3] [4] [6]. Advocates and recent lawsuits continue to allege hazardous child labor in West African cocoa supply chains that include Cargill sourcing [7] [8] [9].
3. U.S. meatpacking plant investigations — underage workers and hazardous tasks via contractor
A U.S. Department of Labor investigation found minors working in dangerous sanitation roles at a Cargill meatpacking plant in Dodge City, Kansas; a cleaning contractor, Packers Sanitation Services Inc., was fined nearly $400,000 for illegally employing children who worked with backsaws, brisket saws and head splitters [5]. Reporting tied that probe to a broader, multi‑state sweep that found dozens of children in hazardous meatpacking jobs across several plants and employers [5].
4. Forced labour and “slave” allegations in other supply chains and countries
NGOs and investigative outlets have alleged patterns of bonded or forced‑labour dynamics in Cargill supply chains in places such as Papua New Guinea and Indonesia (debt schemes, intimidation and linked violence against Indigenous communities), with campaigning groups long warning of vulnerability to slave labour in palm oil, cocoa and other commodities [10] [11]. These are primarily NGO reports and campaign materials documenting supplier‑level abuses and land/labour conflicts [12] [13] [11].
5. Wage suppression and wage‑related litigation in the U.S. meat industry
While not labeled “wage theft” in every instance, U.S. workers alleged companies including Cargill conspired to suppress wages. Cargill agreed to pay nearly $29.75 million as part of a 2024 settlement over claims processors shared compensation data to keep wages down [14] [15]. Separately, litigation over unpaid overtime tied to timekeeping outages and other wage claims has proceeded against Cargill [16]. These settlements were characterized by defendants denying wrongdoing while resolving class claims [15].
6. Company responses, policies, and dispute over responsibility
Cargill publicly states it “does not tolerate” child or forced labor and points to programs like its Child Labor Monitoring and Remediation System and other partnerships to address risks [17] [18] [19]. The company has also appealed judicial findings in Brazil and denied liability in other suits, and the Supreme Court ruling in 2021 favored Cargill on the specific legal theory brought by Malians trafficked to Côte d’Ivoire [4] [6]. NGOs criticize Cargill for failing to fully prevent abuses in complex, small‑holder supply chains [12] [13].
7. What the available sources do and do not establish
Available reporting and court documents establish: (a) a Brazilian labor court ordered compensation tied to child/forced labour found among cocoa suppliers to Cargill [1] [2]; (b) U.S. and NGO litigation has repeatedly alleged child slavery in West African cocoa linked to Cargill suppliers though the Supreme Court limited that ATS claim [3] [4]; and (c) a U.S. DOL probe led to fines over minors working at a Cargill plant under a contractor [5]. Available sources do not mention Cargill admitting systemic company‑level guilt across all allegations; instead they show a mix of judicial findings, ongoing litigation, NGO reporting, and Cargill policy responses [17] [19].
Context and trade‑offs: courts and regulators have sometimes found supplier‑level abuses and ordered remedies, while other high‑profile suits have been dismissed on legal or jurisdictional grounds; NGOs argue corporate programs are insufficient given persistent child labour prevalence in cocoa‑producing regions [2] [3] [18] [12]. Readers should weigh court rulings, settlements and fines (concrete legal outcomes) against ongoing NGO investigations and class actions (continuing allegations).