Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How much US farmland is owned by Chinese companies as of 2025?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the most recent USDA data available, Chinese companies own approximately 265,000-277,000 acres of US farmland as of 2025. The sources provide slightly varying figures: some report 265,000 acres [1] [2], while others cite the more recent 2023 USDA year-end report showing 276,000-277,000 acres [3] [4].
Approximately half of this Chinese-owned farmland is tied to a single company - Smithfield Foods, which is owned by the Chinese firm WH Group [1] [2]. This concentration means that one major acquisition significantly impacts the total acreage statistics.
The data shows that Chinese ownership of US farmland has actually dropped sharply in recent years [1], indicating a declining trend rather than increasing acquisition.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks crucial context about the relative scale of Chinese farmland ownership. According to American Farm Bureau analysis, Chinese investors account for only 0.02% of all foreign-owned US agricultural land [4]. This represents an extremely small fraction of total US farmland.
Political and economic stakeholders benefit from different narratives around this issue:
- National security hawks and protectionist politicians benefit from emphasizing foreign ownership as a threat, leading to policies like the announced US ban on Chinese farmland purchases [1]
- Agricultural industry groups may benefit from highlighting the minimal actual impact to counter restrictive policies that could affect broader foreign investment
- Media organizations benefit from covering this as a contentious national security issue
The sources reveal that the US government has announced plans to ban Chinese purchases of farmland citing national security concerns [1] [2], and China has issued warnings over these proposed restrictions [3]. This policy context significantly shapes how the ownership statistics are interpreted and presented.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question itself is neutral and factual, simply asking for current ownership figures. However, the framing could potentially contribute to misinformation if the answer is used without proper context about:
- The extremely small percentage this represents of total US farmland
- The declining trend in Chinese acquisitions rather than increasing threat
- The concentration in a single major company (Smithfield) rather than widespread acquisition
- The existing policy responses already being implemented to address concerns
The question's timing coincides with heightened political attention to foreign farmland ownership, which could lead to the statistics being used to support various political narratives without acknowledging the minimal scale of actual Chinese ownership relative to total US agricultural land.