Which Coca-Cola facilities are scheduled for closure and what jobs will be lost
Executive summary
Coca‑Cola has announced or been reported to be closing multiple U.S. production and distribution sites this year and in recent months — commonly cited as five U.S. facilities whose combined job losses approach "nearly 900" workers, with specific closures including American Canyon (Napa County) at about 135 jobs, Modesto at 101 jobs, Northampton, MA (reported figures vary, often cited near 319–320), and Hawaii’s Mapunapuna bottling plant at 25 jobs (total estimates and counts vary across outlets) [1] [2] [3] [4]. Reporting points to these moves as part of an “asset‑right” strategy that shifts production and logistics toward third‑party co‑packers and distribution centers [5] [6].
1. What outlets are naming as closing — five U.S. sites, with numbers attached
Multiple aggregated stories identify five U.S. Coca‑Cola production or distribution sites slated for closure, and they place the total U.S. job losses “close to” or “nearly” 900 workers [1] [7] [8]. Local and regional reporting supplies site‑level figures: American Canyon (Napa County), California — reported WARN notice and coverage show a June 30 main shutdown with about 135 jobs affected [2] [5]. Modesto, California — a Reyes Coca‑Cola bottling shutdown reported earlier carries 101 job losses [3]. Northampton, Massachusetts — repeatedly cited as a large site in limbo with numbers around 319–320 workers affected in several outlets [1] [7] [9]. Hawaii’s Mapunapuna bottling plant — Coca‑Cola Bottling of Hawaii says 25 employees will be affected as the production site closes and a distribution warehouse is built [4]. Aggregators and commentary pieces list the closures together and arrive at the near‑900 total by summing those and other distribution hubs [1] [6].
2. How consistent are the counts and why they differ
Numbers vary by source and by whether stories bundle multiple closures, include distribution hubs or only production lines, or cite WARN filings versus company statements. National roundups use the near‑900 figure [1] [7], while local reporting cites precise WARN counts: American Canyon’s 135 jobs [2], Modesto’s 101 [3], and Hawaii’s 25 [4]. Northampton’s figure is reported unevenly across outlets (around 319–320 in several pieces) and some aggregator sites add other distribution center losses to reach the larger total [1] [9]. The discrepancy reflects differing story bases — local WARN notices, company franchise statements, and summary pieces that combine multiple announcements [2] [4] [1].
3. Corporate rationale cited in reporting
Reports quote Coca‑Cola and franchise owners describing these moves as strategic optimization or an “asset‑right” shift: transitioning production volumes to third‑party co‑packers and focusing on distribution or warehousing rather than in‑house bottling [5] [4]. Coverage notes Coca‑Cola’s broader, multi‑year pattern of outsourcing and restructuring — including prior closures in Florida and California and corporate restructurings going back to 2020–2021 — as context for current moves [6] [10].
4. Local impact and company responses
Local outlets and WARN notices emphasize immediate worker impacts: layoffs at American Canyon (135 jobs), Modesto (101 jobs), and Mapunapuna, Hawaii (25 jobs) are explicitly reported [2] [3] [4]. Reporting indicates the company encourages displaced workers to seek roles within Coca‑Cola’s network or partner bottlers and frames closures as decisions made with operational efficiency in mind [11] [5]. Sources also note delayed timelines (e.g., American Canyon planned earlier but postponed) and that some warehouse operations or small transition teams remain through closure windows [2] [12].
5. Alternative perspectives and implications
Critics in aggregate reporting argue that closures happen while Coca‑Cola remains profitable — outlets note projected revenue growth even as domestic sites shut — framing the moves as prioritizing cost‑saving and outsourcing over local jobs [6]. Environmental and labor advocates are cited as concerned that shifting production to third parties reduces local oversight and may accelerate automation and packaging decisions with negative externalities [6] [12]. Company statements and franchise owners stress strategic optimization rather than financial distress [4] [5].
6. What reporting does not say (limits of current sources)
Available sources do not mention a single definitive list of the five sites with an agreed‑upon job‑loss sum that reconciles all local counts; they do not publish a comprehensive Coca‑Cola corporate communication that lists every affected facility and exact headcount in one place (not found in current reporting). Sources also do not provide full details on severance packages, re‑employment assistance specifics, or the identities of every third‑party co‑packer receiving transferred volumes beyond named partners like Refresco in prior deals [5] [13].
Bottom line: reporting across national aggregators and local outlets identifies at least five U.S. Coca‑Cola production/distribution site closures tied to roughly 900 total job losses when summed; local WARN notices provide firm counts for several major sites (American Canyon 135; Modesto 101; Mapunapuna/Hawaii 25), while Northampton and other hubs account for the larger remaining totals [1] [2] [3] [4].