What compensation, if any, did companies like ExxonMobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips receive for Venezuelan expropriations?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
ConocoPhillips won a multibillion-dollar arbitration that culminated in an ICSID/World Bank award requiring Venezuela to pay roughly $8.7 billion for 2007 expropriations — a decision the state unsuccessfully tried to annul and which as of recent reporting remains a judgment Venezuela is ordered to satisfy [1] [2]. ExxonMobil secured a separate ICSID award in 2014 for roughly $1.6 billion over nationalizations but enforcement and offsets have complicated actual collection [3] [4]. Chevron took a different, negotiated path and struck a deal with Caracas rather than relying solely on arbitration, leaving its compensation arrangements distinct from lawsuits by Exxon and Conoco [5].
1. ConocoPhillips: a near‑nine‑billion arbitration victory
ConocoPhillips’ litigation produced the largest clear award: an ICSID tribunal found Venezuela’s 2007 seizures of Petrozuata, Hamaca and Corocoro unlawful and in March 2019 ordered Venezuela to pay about $8.7 billion plus interest — a ruling ConocoPhillips publicly hailed and which the tribunal later upheld when Venezuela’s annulment attempt failed, leaving the $8.7 billion obligation intact in 2025 [1] [2].
2. ExxonMobil: a smaller award, contested enforcement and offsets
ExxonMobil’s ICSID victory in October 2014 produced an award in the vicinity of $1.6 billion for expropriation and related curtailments, but the practical result was nuanced: the tribunal’s monetary findings included several line items (for example, roughly $1.41 billion tied to Cerro Negro) and Venezuela and PDVSA pointed to prior payments and set‑offs — notably a $908 million payment tied to Cerro Negro — while enforcement in U.S. courts and elsewhere has faced legal obstacles [3] [4] [6].
3. Chevron and negotiated exits: compensation by deal, not headline arbitration
Chevron’s response to the 2007 nationalizations followed a negotiated path rather than the blockbuster ICSID awards sought by Exxon and Conoco: reporting notes Chevron “struck a deal” with the Venezuelan government while Exxon and Conoco pushed long legal fights, meaning Chevron’s compensation, terms and continued operations were handled through bilateral arrangements rather than the large, public arbitration awards that characterize the other two disputes [5].
4. Why a legal win is not the same as cash in the bank — enforcement and political pushback
Even where tribunals have ordered payment, collecting awards from a sovereign facing economic stress and political resistance is difficult: ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil have pursued enforcement actions, sought to attach assets and litigated in multiple jurisdictions, and Venezuela has framed some rulings as politically biased or claimed its prior offers were reasonable — points the state used to portray itself as having “won” or mitigated liabilities [7] [5] [6]. Legal practitioners and commentary also highlight nuances in valuation dates, offsets, and treaty law that altered award sizes and collectability, and courts or tribunals have reached different conclusions across cases, complicating the simple narrative of “paid” or “unpaid” [4] [8].
5. Competing narratives: firms’ victories vs. Venezuelan sovereignty claims
Multinationals frame the arbitration results as vindication of investor rights and fair‑market compensation; Venezuela’s government has countered by emphasizing offers it says were fair and calling large claims exaggerated or politically motivated — an argument made repeatedly in state statements after rulings and reflected in reporting that notes Caracas’ claims of partial victories even when awards were ordered [7] [6]. Independent legal analyses show tribunals split on issues like whether expropriations were lawful and how to value assets, which explains divergent awards and why some companies pursued negotiated settlements instead [9] [8].
6. Bottom line: awards exist, payment remains uncertain and case by case matters
The factual record shows ConocoPhillips obtained an ~$8.7 billion ICSID award and ExxonMobil an ~$1.6 billion award tied to 2007 nationalizations, while Chevron arranged negotiated terms rather than pursuing the same arbitration route; but the transformation of those awards into cash has been subject to offsets, enforcement hurdles and political resistance by Venezuela, meaning legal victory has not always equated to immediate or full compensation in hand [1] [3] [5] [4] [2].