Are there court documents listing all corporate entities tied to Donald J. Trump in each bankruptcy case?

Checked on December 31, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Bankruptcy court filings do include the names of the corporate debtors for each Chapter 11 case, and analysts and trade groups have compiled lists of the entities that filed in specific Trump-related bankruptcies (ABI, ThoughtCo) [1] [2]. There is no single, court‑issued master list in the provided reporting that aggregates every corporate entity tied to Donald J. Trump across all bankruptcy proceedings—researchers must pull debtor names from individual case dockets, schedules, and compiled summaries [3] [2].

1. What courts actually file: debtor names and schedules

When a company files for Chapter 11 it files a petition that identifies the debtor entity by name and typically attaches schedules and statements listing assets, creditors, and related corporate affiliates; those court documents therefore contain the corporate names that were in bankruptcy (this is the standard reflected in reporting that cites case names such as Trump Taj Mahal Associates, Trump Castle Associates, and others) [1] [3].

2. Why there is no single “one‑document” roster across all cases in the reporting

The available reporting and public compilations (ABI, ThoughtCo, Tax Policy Center) present lists of the companies that filed in particular cases or filings tied to episodes of restructuring, but the sources do not show a single consolidated court document that lists every corporate entity across all of Trump’s separate bankruptcy filings; instead, researchers rely on individual case dockets or third‑party summaries to assemble a cross‑case list [1] [2] [3].

3. Existing compiled lists and their limits

Trade organizations and news outlets have created summaries naming the companies involved in specific bankruptcies—ABI summarized the Taj Mahal and later casino filings and listed case numbers such as Trump Castle Associates (Case No. 92‑11191) and related entities [1], and ThoughtCo. and other outlets have produced chronologies of the six corporate Chapter 11 filings attributed to Trump’s businesses [2]. Those compilations are useful but depend on which court records the author consulted and do not, in the sources provided, claim to be an official single court‑issued master list [2].

4. Deeper source material that would produce a definitive roster

A definitive, court‑authenticated roster across all bankruptcies would require pulling each case’s petition, docket sheet, and schedules (and the Plaza Funding/Plaza Partnership filings discussed by the Tax Policy Center demonstrate how related entities appear in specific dockets) [3]. The New York Times and regulatory reviews have relied on digging through those court and regulatory records to map corporate relationships, underscoring that the primary source is the case files themselves rather than a single summary document [2].

5. Competing narratives and implicit agendas in reporting

Campaign materials and summaries sometimes compress or emphasize counts—e.g., a campaign press release cited “four times” in a specific political context—while other writers and watchdogs emphasize “six corporate bankruptcies,” reflecting different framing choices and agendas in the sources [4] [2]. Readers should note that commercial write‑ups and advocacy pieces may select subsets of entities to make a political point; the underlying court dockets remain the neutral primary evidence [2] [1].

6. Practical takeaway for researchers

To produce an authoritative list of all corporate entities tied to Trump in each bankruptcy, the necessary method is documentary: retrieve each bankruptcy petition, schedules, and docket entries for the identified cases (as summarized by ABI and other compilers) and compile the debtor names and affiliated filings; the reporting indicates such work has been done by journalists and analysts but does not provide a single, court‑issued master list in the materials supplied here [1] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
Which specific court dockets and case numbers correspond to each Trump‑related Chapter 11 filing?
How did The New York Times and other outlets reconstruct corporate relationships from bankruptcy and regulatory records in their Trump investigations?
What differences exist between political summaries of 'bankruptcies' and the underlying bankruptcy docket records?