Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the criteria for determining non-profit CEO salaries in the US?
Executive summary
Nonprofit CEO pay in the U.S. is governed by a mix of legal standards and customary practices: boards must set compensation that is “reasonable and not excessive” and typically rely on comparable-market data and independent review when approving pay (National Council of Nonprofits) [1]. Market surveys and IRS-based compensation reports show huge variation—from median/market estimates in the low‑to‑mid six figures to outliers in the high six/seven figures—so criteria and process, not a single number, determine a nonprofit CEO’s salary (Guidestar; Salary.com; Avra Search Partners) [2] [3] [4].
1. Boards hold the legal and ethical responsibility for setting pay
State and federal rules and nonprofit best-practices make the board of directors responsible for hiring the CEO and approving compensation; the board must ensure pay is reasonable, not excessive, and sufficient to attract and retain talent (National Council of Nonprofits) [1]. Several guidance documents stress that compensation decisions belong to the board and should be documented and defensible [1].
2. “Comparable” market data is the primary objective criterion
Boards are advised to rely on comparable salary data: surveys, compensation consultants, and databases that collect IRS Form 990 filings (Candid/GuideStar) are typical sources. The goal is to compare organizations with similar mission, budget size, and geography—e.g., you would not compare a rural day care CEO to the CEO of a major urban hospital [1] [2]. GuideStar’s compensation report is explicitly built from IRS data and is a common benchmark [2].
3. Use of an independent body or advisor to avoid conflicts
Best practice is for an “independent body” of the board (often a compensation committee comprising independent directors) or an outside consultant to review and recommend pay, reducing self‑dealing risk and providing documentary support that pay is within market norms [1]. The Council of Nonprofits specifically recommends independent review and documentation of all components of compensation [1].
4. Total compensation includes benefits and fringe items — not just base salary
When assessing whether pay is reasonable, boards must include salary plus benefits and fringe (insurance, housing allowances, car, bonuses, etc.) in the total compensation package [1]. Guidance repeatedly emphasizes that total annual compensation should be the basis for comparison and reporting [1].
5. Size, complexity, and mission drive large salary variation
Market data shows massive divergence in CEO pay depending on organizational scale and mission: large nonprofits (budgets in the tens of millions) and those with complex operations commonly pay well above six figures; some specialized or large organizations report CEO pay in the mid‑to‑high six figures or beyond (Avra Search Partners; Salary.com) [4] [3]. Recruiters and salary platforms note that CEO pay ranges differ by geography and sector, explaining much of the spread [4] [3].
6. Multiple data sources give widely different benchmarks — know their limits
Private salary platforms and job‑posting aggregates (ZipRecruiter, PayScale, Salary.com, Glassdoor, Comparably) produce very different averages and ranges: ZipRecruiter shows mid‑five‑figure medians for some nonprofit CEO listings while Salary.com and recruiter reports produce averages approaching or exceeding mid‑six figures [5] [6] [3] [7] [8] [9]. Boards should recognize each source’s methodology (self‑reported samples, job postings, or 990‑based IRS analysis) and pick benchmarks that match their nonprofit’s profile [2] [4].
7. Legal and reputational checks: documentation and comparability rationale
Because executive pay in nonprofits attracts public scrutiny (including watchdog groups like CharityWatch), boards must document the process: minutes showing independent review, noted comparables, and rationale for any pay above typical ranges (CharityWatch commentary and watchdog attention) [10] [1]. Documentation defends against accusations of excess while showing the board considered mission impact and market realities [1] [10].
8. Practical steps boards commonly follow when setting CEO pay
Common procedural criteria include: (a) convene a compensation or governance committee; (b) obtain comparable compensation data from 990‑based reports, salary surveys, and consultants; (c) include total compensation (benefits, bonuses) in calculations; (d) document independent review and board approval; and (e) periodically update benchmarks during leadership searches or annual reviews [1] [2] [4].
9. How compensation debates play out in public and recruiting markets
Recruiters and market analysts note rising expectations for top candidates — larger nonprofits now advertise CEO roles in high six‑figure bands, and some executive searches report average CEO job listings exceeding $175,000 to $250,000 depending on mission and scale (Avra Search Partners; Glassdoor summary) [4] [9]. At the same time, watchdogs question seven‑figure pay in some cases, showing the tension between market rates and public perceptions (CharityWatch) [10].
Limitations and gaps in coverage: available sources do not provide a single statutory formula or fixed cap for nonprofit CEO pay — guidance focuses on process, comparability, and documentation rather than numeric thresholds (not found in current reporting). For a board doing this work, follow the Council of Nonprofits’ procedural checklist and use IRS‑based and market surveys that match your organization’s size and mission [1] [2].