Are there any negative reviews or complaints about Crossing Hurdles on consumer protection sites?
Executive summary
Crossing Hurdles appears in multiple consumer-review and employment-review sites with both critical entries and positive legitimacy checks: Ripoff Report returns a large number of hits for the name (suggesting many complaint-style posts) and Glassdoor carries several employee reviews including at least one titled "It's a scam" [1] [2] [3], while third‑party site scanners rate crossinghurdles.com as largely legitimate and secure [4] [5]. Public reporting here shows the presence of negative reviews/complaints on consumer-facing and employment-review platforms, but also countervailing trust signals from scam‑checker services; the available sources do not provide a full picture of complaint content, volume by verified users, or outcomes.
1. Ripoff Report: a large presence that signals complaints but not verified claims
A search result for "crossing-hurdles-reviews" on Ripoff Report returns a page promising "more than 23,237 complaints" for that query, which indicates either a large number of indexed items that mention the phrase or an automated count generated by the site rather than an audited tally of verified consumer disputes [1]. Ripoff Report is a platform that hosts user-submitted complaints and allegations, and the presence of many indexed items signals that critics or disgruntled users have posted there, but the source does not establish whether those posts were substantiated, addressed, or whether they refer to the same business entity [1].
2. Glassdoor: employee reviews include critical language and a small sample size
Glassdoor lists six Crossing Hurdles reviews submitted anonymously by current or former employees, demonstrating that negative sentiment exists within employee-review channels as well as in consumer spaces; among those entries is a review with the headline "It's a scam," and another mentioning an odd AI interview experience, showing a mix of complaint-focused and observational posts [2] [3]. That count—six reviews—means the dataset on Glassdoor is small and employee‑submitted, which can reflect real workplace grievances but may not translate directly into consumer-protection complaints about business practices [2] [3].
3. Scam-detector and Gridinsoft: site-safety checks push back against scam claims
Independent website validators provide opposing context: Scam Detector scored crossinghurdles.com highly (an 82.6 trust score) and labeled it "Reliable. Legitimate. Secure," indicating technical and reputational signals consistent with a functioning business website [4]. Gridinsoft’s review similarly highlights domain longevity, payment protections, and data forms, noting operational stability and that the site implements typical data-collection and payment mechanisms—facts consistent with a legitimate online presence but not a substitute for adjudicated consumer-dispute records [5].
4. Platform differences and what the evidence actually proves
The evidence across sources shows negative reviews and complaints exist on platforms aimed at public whistleblowing and employee feedback (Ripoff Report and Glassdoor) while independent security/legitimacy checks indicate the website is technically sound [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. The sources provided do not contain court filings, regulator enforcement actions, or a consolidated consumer‑protection database finding against Crossing Hurdles, so the reporting cannot confirm whether complaints have been investigated, resolved, or whether they reflect isolated disputes versus systemic consumer-harm [1] [2] [4].
5. Corporate profile and available complaint channels
A company profile on Internshala describes Crossing Hurdles as an ed‑tech initiative and lists a complaints email address for appeals, implying the business acknowledges dispute channels and routes for resolution [6]. That entry supports the notion that Crossing Hurdles operates publicly and provides contact points for grievances, but the profile does not report the volume or nature of complaints nor independent verification of the company’s handling of disputes [6].
6. Bottom line: complaints exist, but context and verification are incomplete
The record assembled from the cited sources shows negative reviews and complaint-style postings about Crossing Hurdles on consumer and employment review sites—Ripoff Report’s high index count and negative Glassdoor reviews establish that—but independent website validators rate the site as trustworthy and there is no sourced evidence here of regulatory actions or verified large-scale consumer fraud [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Given these mixed signals, a fuller assessment would require inspection of the actual complaint texts on Ripoff Report and Glassdoor, any responses from Crossing Hurdles, payment dispute records, and regulator or court filings—information not contained in the provided sources [1] [2] [4] [5].