Does Deezer have published human rights and supply chain policies?
Executive summary
Deezer publishes a Code of Ethics and legal terms that touch on human-rights-related issues (zero-tolerance on bribery; content must not infringe privacy or dignity) as shown in its investor materials and Terms & Conditions [1] [2]. On supply-chain and human-rights policies beyond those documents, available sources do not mention a standalone published supplier or human‑rights policy on Deezer’s public sites, though Deezer’s newsroom and investor pages reference diversity, wellbeing and possible “supplier policy” updates in the context of AI content [3] [4].
1. What Deezer has made public: governance and a Code of Ethics
Deezer’s investor site hosts a Code of Ethics (dated Oct. 2024) that states a zero‑tolerance approach to bribery and corruption, signalling formal governance commitments at the corporate level [1]. The company’s Terms & Conditions include provisions that content “does not infringe any right to privacy or promote disrespect for human dignity,” which links service rules to basic human‑rights concerns [2]. These documents amount to published corporate governance texts that touch on ethical and rights-related matters.
2. Supply‑chain policies: what the sources say and what they do not
Deezer’s investor pages describe human resources priorities — talent development, wellbeing, and diversity & inclusion — showing internal people‑policy commitments [3]. However, none of the provided results show a standalone supplier code of conduct, multi‑tier supply‑chain due diligence statement, or a published modern‑slavery / human‑trafficking disclosure typical of larger manufacturers and retailers; available sources do not mention a detailed supplier or supply‑chain human‑rights policy for Deezer [3] [1] [2].
3. AI policy context where Deezer signals rights protection of creators
Deezer has positioned itself publicly as a defender of artists’ rights in the AI era: it signed the Statement on AI Training and has repeatedly described commitments to “protecting the rights of artists and creators,” deploying AI detection and tagging to block fraudulent AI‑generated streaming and to prevent improper monetization [5] [6] [4]. Those moves are framed as ethical protections for creators rather than comprehensive human‑rights or supplier‑chain due diligence policies [6] [4].
4. Public actions tied to policy language: enforcement and practical steps
Deezer has acted operationally on its AI/rights stance: it applied for patents for AI‑detection tools (Dec 2024), labels 100% AI tracks, filters fraudulent streams out of royalties, and excludes such content from editorial and algorithmic recommendations — concrete steps that align with its stated artist‑rights commitments [6] [4]. These operational steps address platform integrity and creators’ economic rights but do not substitute for a published supply‑chain human‑rights due‑diligence policy [6] [4].
5. Where reporting points to gaps or nuance
Industry coverage and watchdog‑style sites note Deezer’s ethical positioning and contrast it with larger rivals, but the reporting primarily discusses AI, artist payments and internal D&I initiatives rather than third‑party supplier audits or forced‑labour disclosures [7] [8] [3]. Ethical Consumer and other analysts reference Deezer’s ethical profile but the provided snippets don’t cite a supplier or modern‑slavery statement; available sources do not mention such a document [9] [3].
6. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas
Deezer’s public narrative emphasizes artist protection and “ethical” streaming as a differentiator versus big rivals — a commercial positioning that also serves marketing and investor relations aims [7] [8]. Investor materials stress employee wellbeing and governance, which supports capital-market trust but may not address supplier-tier risks often highlighted by NGOs and regulators; the sources show corporate messaging but not comprehensive external verification [1] [3].
7. What to do next if you need confirmation or a copy of a policy
For definitive proof of any supplier code, modern‑slavery statement, or human‑rights due‑diligence report, consult Deezer’s official governance or legal pages and investor relations downloads (the Code of Ethics is available; Terms & Conditions are published) or request documents directly from Deezer’s IR/legal contacts — current reporting shows the Code of Ethics and T&Cs but available sources do not supply a published supplier‑specific human‑rights policy [1] [2] [3].
Limitations: This analysis relies only on the provided search results. If Deezer has published additional supplier or human‑rights policies after these sources were indexed, those documents are not reflected here; available sources do not mention them [1] [2] [3] [4].