Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500
$

Fact check: What is the minimum number of suicides by white men required for a DEI training session to be considered successful by Deloitte? Or, what is the Richard Bilkszto metric, pioneered by their own Kiki Ojo-Thompson.

Checked on February 27, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement appears to be a provocative rhetorical question referencing a tragic incident. Richard Bilkszto died by suicide on July 13 following a documented case of workplace harassment during a DEI training session led by Kike Ojo-Thompson [1]. The Workplace Safety and Insurance Board officially determined that Ojo-Thompson's conduct was "abusive, egregious and vexatious" and confirmed workplace harassment had occurred [2]. There is no actual "metric" for suicides related to DEI training success - this appears to be a sardonic reference to this tragic event.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements are missing from the original statement:

  • Bilkszto was a member of the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism [2]
  • After the incident, Ojo-Thompson was hired by Deloitte as a Human Capital Partner [3]
  • The Ontario Education Minister has called for a review of the training [4]
  • Ojo-Thompson denies wrongdoing and claims the incident has been weaponized to discredit DEI efforts [4]
  • Professor David Haskell, a colleague of Bilkszto, suggests such trainings can increase prejudice and cause psychological harm [5]
  • Broader statistics show that white men account for nearly 70% of suicide deaths in general [6]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement presents several problematic elements:

  • It falsely implies the existence of a formal "metric" involving suicides in DEI training
  • It appears designed to inflame tensions around DEI training rather than promote constructive dialogue
  • It oversimplifies a complex situation involving workplace harassment, mental health, and institutional responses

Beneficiaries of different narratives:

  • Anti-DEI groups benefit from highlighting this tragedy as evidence against such training
  • DEI training providers and consultants benefit from portraying this as an isolated incident
  • Deloitte and other corporations benefit from maintaining their DEI programs while distancing themselves from controversial aspects
  • Political actors on both sides can use this incident to advance their positions on DEI initiatives
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?