Are there trademark filings or corporate records linking Dr. Mehmet Oz to any supplements named 'Iron Boost'?
Executive summary
There are no sourced trademark filings or corporate records in the provided reporting that directly link Dr. Mehmet Oz to a supplement product named "Iron Boost"; a marketplace listing and third‑party reviews claim a product called "Iron Boost By Dr Oz," but Dr. Oz’s official site warns that scammers sell fake products using his name and likeness [1] [2]. Public reporting does document Dr. Oz’s broader trademark activity and commercial relationships with supplement retailers, which creates a context in which fake or unauthorized products can appear and be misattributed to him [3] [4] [5].
1. What the sources actually show about an "Iron Boost" product
A consumer review page and small storefront listings advertise a supplement called "Iron Boost By Dr Oz" and include promotional language and customer testimonials, but those pages are third‑party commercial listings and reviews rather than trademark registrations or corporate filings tying the product formally to Dr. Oz [1]. The presence of such listings indicates a marketed product using his name, yet the listings themselves are not the same as evidence of a trademark filing or business registration owned by Dr. Oz [1].
2. What Dr. Oz’s team has publicly said and why that matters
Dr. Oz’s official website explicitly warns consumers about scammers selling fake products using his name and likeness and even fake AI videos, advising followers to rely only on verified channels for authentic content — a direct statement that his team confronts unauthorized commercial use of his identity [2]. That warning is important context: it supports a plausible explanation for why marketplace pages might use his name without his authorization, and it underscores that a third‑party listing alone does not prove legal ownership or endorsement by Dr. Oz [2].
3. What trademark reporting and filings in the public record show about Dr. Oz’s brand (but not Iron Boost)
Trademark analysts and reporting note that Dr. Oz has multiple trademarks around "Dr. Oz" and The Dr. Oz Show and that he has filed new applications for his brand in areas such as virtual goods and services, demonstrating active management of his intellectual property portfolio [3] [4]. These filings establish that Dr. Oz has pursued trademark protection for his name as a brand, but the sources provided do not include a trademark registration or application specifically for the phrase "Iron Boost" tied to Dr. Oz’s name [3] [4].
4. Commercial and ethical context from investigative reporting
Investigative pieces and watchdog reporting document Dr. Oz’s paid relationships and public endorsements in the supplements market — notably ties to iHerb and other supplement promotions — which have drawn scrutiny about disclosure and financial interest [5] [6] [7]. That reporting shows he has been a commercial participant in the supplement space, which explains both why his name appears in product marketing and why journalists and regulators pay attention to claims of endorsement; nonetheless, those stories do not equate to a corporate record or trademark registration linking him to an "Iron Boost" product specifically in the materials provided [5] [6] [7].
5. Conclusion, limits of available evidence, and recommended next steps for verification
Based on the documents and reporting supplied, there is no cited trademark filing or corporate record that conclusively ties Dr. Mehmet Oz to a supplement named "Iron Boost"; available material shows third‑party marketplace listings using his name and his own warning about impersonators, and separate reporting confirms his broader commercial ties to supplement retailers but provides no direct legal linkage to "Iron Boost" [1] [2] [5] [3]. To verify definitively, one would need to search the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office database for any trademark registrations or applications for "IRON BOOST" or similar marks listing Dr. Mehmet C. Oz or his corporate entities, and check state business registries and FDA/FTC records for manufacturing or labeling records naming him or his companies; those searches were not contained in the material provided here, and thus cannot be asserted from these sources [3] [4] [2].