Has Elon musk companies dropped in value since he worked for trump?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Elon Musk’s personal net worth and the market value of his flagship companies — especially Tesla — fell sharply after his visible role in the political scene surrounding the 2024 U.S. election and his work with the second Trump administration, with Tesla’s market cap down roughly 45% from its December 2024 peak and Musk’s net worth falling by roughly $100–$126 billion in early 2025 according to multiple outlets [1] [2] [3] [4]. Reporting ties the declines primarily to Tesla’s weak sales and profits, broader market volatility and investor concerns about Musk’s political activity, but different outlets emphasize different mixes of causes [5] [4] [1].
1. Market moves: Tesla’s plunge erased most of the election rally gains
Tesla’s market capitalization collapsed from a December 17, 2024 peak near $1.5 trillion to roughly half that level in early 2025 — a drop Reuters places at about 45% from the high — erasing much of the post-election rally that accompanied Musk’s political involvement [5]. Newsweek and Forbes also document major declines in Tesla share price and note that the company’s market value and Musk’s stake accounted for the lion’s share of his paper losses [1] [2].
2. How much did Musk lose — different outlets, similar story
Estimates of the decline in Musk’s net worth vary by outlet but converge on a very large loss: Newsweek and Forbes reported drops on the order of $100–$121 billion in early 2025 [1] [2], while Fortune and other coverage put his wealth below $400 billion after peaking near $486 billion in December 2024 [4]. Wikipedia’s summary likewise records a roughly $126 billion decline between December 2024 and March 2025, reflecting the same factual arc even if the precise figure differs by source [3].
3. Causes cited in reporting: business fundamentals, politics and perception
Journalists and analysts point to three overlapping drivers. First, Tesla’s operating picture deteriorated: falling vehicle sales, weaker profits and missed growth expectations undercut the valuation thesis built on future autonomy and robotaxi prospects [5]. Second, investors reacted to broader market forces and policy uncertainty tied to tariffs and economic moves under the Trump administration, which some reporters say imperiled investor sentiment for Musk's businesses [2]. Third, multiple outlets report that Musk’s visible role in Trump’s administration and the political fallout — including consumer pushback and protests — damaged perception and brand loyalty, which analysts cite as weighing on sales and investor confidence [4] [1] [5].
4. Evidence connecting politics and value: correlation more than consensus on causation
Reporting documents a correlation between Musk’s political entanglement and the timing of the stock declines, and some analysts quoted directly attribute part of the slump to political backlash and “political baggage” [4] [1]. Reuters and Fortune, however, foreground operating weaknesses — falling sales and unmet product rollouts — as primary drivers while noting political protests as a contributing factor, indicating sources disagree on the relative weight of politics versus business performance [5] [6].
5. Other Musk companies: private valuations and mixed fortunes
While Tesla’s public market rout dominated headlines and Musk’s wealth calculations, SpaceX and other private ventures remained highly valued in many reports — SpaceX valuations around $350 billion were cited even as Tesla shares plunged [1] [7]. Some pieces note turbulence for Musk’s nonpublic businesses too, and Cointelegraph and others flag write-downs and valuation swings for X and xAI, underscoring variability across his portfolio [1] [7].
6. What reporting does not show or resolve
Available sources do not mention a single, definitive causal study proving that Musk’s work for Trump alone caused the market declines; coverage cites a mix of investor reaction to fundamentals, macro policy concerns and political backlash without universal agreement on their respective magnitudes (not found in current reporting). The precise contribution of tariffs, consumer boycotts, operational misses and investor rotation remains debated across the cited pieces [2] [5] [4].
7. Bottom line for readers: headline losses, nuanced drivers
The facts reported are clear: Musk lost tens of billions of dollars of paper wealth after December 2024 as Tesla shares plunged and valuations shifted, and several outlets tie at least part of that decline to fallout from his political role [1] [2] [4]. But journalism across Reuters, Fortune, Newsweek and others shows this was a multifactor event — weak sales and product delays at Tesla, market volatility and political backlash combined — and sources disagree over which factor mattered most [5] [4] [1]. Readers should treat simple cause-and-effect claims with caution; the reporting documents sharp value declines and offers competing interpretations rather than a single settled explanation [1] [5].