Has Elon Musk ever endorsed or invested in medical products related to urinary health?

Checked on January 18, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

There is no credible reporting that Elon Musk has endorsed or invested in medical products specifically targeting urinary health; contemporary coverage instead focuses on allegations that his personal ketamine use caused bladder problems (Rolling Stone summarizing NYT reporting) and on debunked manipulated videos that falsely show him promoting health remedies (Rolling Stone; Politifact; Thip) [1] [2] [3] [4]. Reporting documents Musk as a subject of health-related stories and deepfake disinformation, but does not produce verifiable evidence of a commercial endorsement or financial investment in urinary-health products.

1. What the reporting actually documents: Musk as a patient/subject, not a promoter

Investigative pieces and summaries have described Musk as complaining of bladder dysfunction linked to heavy ketamine use, and those accounts cite medical literature about ketamine-induced cystitis rather than any business moves by Musk into urinary therapeutics (Rolling Stone recounting New York Times reporting; Futurism summarizing similar claims) [1] [5]. Newsweek and other outlets repeated the NYT’s narrative about his drug use and resultant bladder problems, but none of those stories ties him to promoting or funding urinary-health products [2].

2. False or manipulated endorsements have circulated — but been debunked

Multiple fact-checks and independent checks show manipulated videos and fabricated posts that depict Musk endorsing cures or supplements — including a fake clip that purported to show him promoting a diabetes cure and a social post falsely claiming he endorsed a Barbara O’Neill remedy for erectile dysfunction and prostatitis — and fact-checkers found those items to be fabricated or deepfakes with no supporting evidence on Musk’s accounts (Politifact on the Joe Rogan clip; Thip.media on the O’Neill claim) [3] [4]. These incidents illustrate how viral misinformation can create the appearance of celebrity medical endorsements where none exist.

3. No sourced evidence of investment activity in urinary-health companies

The supplied reporting set contains allegations about Musk’s personal health and debunked promotional videos but does not cite any transactions, SEC filings, press releases, or investigative reporting that document Musk investing in or acquiring companies that sell urinary-health drugs, devices, or supplements; the absence of such evidence in the cited sources means a claim that he has invested in urinary-health products is unsupported by these materials [1] [3] [4].

4. Why confusion spreads: health reporting, social clips and incentives

The media environment around Musk mixes high-profile investigative reporting about his behavior and health (which attracts legitimate public-interest coverage) with opportunistic viral content that edits footage to sell products or narratives; fact-checkers point out that manipulated clips often link to fake testimonial pages or commercial landing pages that financially benefit the creators, while mainstream reporting tends to examine behavior and consequences rather than commercial ties (Politifact on fabricated video; Rolling Stone summarizing NYT's investigative focus) [3] [1]. That blend of topics creates an implicit agenda for scammers and a parallel agenda for sensational press that may emphasize personal details over commercial disclosures.

5. Alternative explanations and limits of the public record

It remains possible — though not shown in the provided reporting — that Musk could quietly invest through private vehicles or non-public deals in health-related ventures; none of the sources before this analysis document such moves into urinary products, and the absence of evidence in these items should not be read as absolute proof he never has any such investment beyond the public record [1] [2]. Responsible reporting distinguishes between documented endorsements/investments and social-media fabrications, and the sources examined consistently separate verified reportage about Musk’s alleged drug use from unverified promotional claims [1] [3] [4].

6. Bottom line with provenance and caveats

Based on the supplied reporting, Elon Musk has been the subject of stories about ketamine use and bladder problems and the target of fabricated promotional videos, but there is no credible, sourced evidence in these items that he has ever endorsed or invested in medical products specifically related to urinary health; fact-checkers have explicitly flagged at least some supposed endorsements as deepfakes or false [1] [3] [4]. If documentary proof of an endorsement or investment exists, it does not appear in the provided sources, and further investigatory reporting or financial records would be required to overturn this conclusion.

Want to dive deeper?
What reputable investigations have traced Elon Musk's investments in healthcare startups or biotech since 2010?
How have deepfakes and manipulated videos been used to falsely attribute health product endorsements to public figures?
What is ketamine-induced cystitis and how has media coverage linked it to recreational ketamine use?