Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Musk stated that "is treasury payment officers having never once denied a paymen!" Why would he make such a misleading statement?

Checked on September 16, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The statement made by Musk, claiming that treasury payment officers have never denied a payment, is not supported by the majority of the analyses provided [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. In fact, some sources directly contradict Musk's claim, stating that the Treasury Department said no payments have been suspended or rejected as part of an ongoing review, and that the review is being conducted with 'read-only' access to the payment systems [3]. Additionally, a Treasury Department official stated that a tech executive working with DOGE will have 'read-only access' to the government's payment system, which contradicts Musk's claim that payment officers never denied a payment [4]. Other sources report that Musk's team was granted access to sensitive Treasury data and the federal payments system, but do not provide evidence to support Musk's claim [1] [2] [5]. It is clear that Musk's statement is misleading and not supported by the available evidence [1] [2] [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some sources provide context on Musk's history of making misleading statements, which could be relevant to understanding his motivations for making such a claim [6]. Others report on the controversy surrounding DOGE's access to the federal government's payment system and the potential risks to Americans' personal data [7] [5]. The Treasury Department's efforts to streamline access to its anti-fraud data and automate the process of fraud and improper payment detection could also be relevant to understanding the context of Musk's statement [8]. Furthermore, the Treasury Department's suspension of enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act against U.S. citizens and domestic reporting companies may be related to the issue at hand, but it is not directly addressed in the analyses [9]. It is essential to consider these alternative viewpoints and missing context to gain a comprehensive understanding of the situation [6] [8].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

Musk's statement appears to be an attempt to mislead the public about the role of treasury payment officers and the access granted to his team [1] [2] [3]. By making such a statement, Musk may be trying to deflect criticism and concerns about the potential risks associated with his team's access to the federal payment system [7] [5]. The fact that some sources report on the controversy surrounding DOGE's access to the federal government's payment system and the potential risks to Americans' personal data suggests that Musk's statement may be an attempt to downplay these concerns and protect his interests [7] [5]. Ultimately, it is crucial to approach Musk's statement with a critical eye and consider the potential biases and misinformation [1] [2] [3] [6] [7] [4] [9] [8] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What is the process for treasury payment officers to deny payments?
Has Elon Musk previously made statements about treasury payment officers?
What are the qualifications and training for treasury payment officers?
How does the treasury department ensure payment officers are making accurate decisions?
Are there any public records of treasury payment officers denying payments?