Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Can employers claim tax deductions for wages paid to undocumented workers?
Executive Summary
Employers generally may claim federal tax deductions for ordinary and necessary business wages paid to employees regardless of the employees’ immigration status; federal law and IRS guidance treat wages as deductible expenses so long as they are legitimate compensation and properly reported, while immigration penalties for hiring unauthorized workers remain a separate enforcement track [1] [2] [3]. States that have tried to deny such deductions have been struck down or preempted where they conflict with federal immigration and tax law, and employers face significant withholding, reporting, and potential civil or criminal exposure if they fail to comply even though the wage deduction itself is allowed [1] [4] [5].
1. What advocates and courts say about the deductibility fight that matters
Federal courts and commentators have concluded that the Internal Revenue Code allows the deduction of wages paid for legitimate services even when the worker lacks authorization, and state statutes attempting to disallow the deduction have been found preempted where they conflict with federal immigration enforcement and tax policy. The Eleventh Circuit’s decision invalidating Alabama’s statute barring a state deduction for wages paid to unauthorized workers is a clear example: the court held federal law governs and the Internal Revenue Code permits ordinary business deductions for compensation so long as the expense meets the usual tax-law requirements [1]. This judicial view aligns with tax-practice analyses that emphasize separation between tax deductibility and immigration sanctioning, undercutting state-level efforts to use tax deductions as immigration enforcement tools [2].
2. IRS guidance and withholding obligations that shape employer behavior
IRS guidance treats compensation for personal services performed in the U.S. as subject to withholding and payroll taxes based on the worker’s residency classification, and still regards those wages as ordinary business expenses deductible under IRC §162 if properly recorded and reported. The withholding rules distinguish resident and nonresident aliens for income tax withholding and apply Social Security, Medicare, and FUTA obligations where appropriate, and the IRS guidance that describes withholding does not strip the payer of the ordinary wage deduction for tax purposes [3]. Therefore, proper withholding and reporting are decisive: failure to report wages on Form W-2 or to withhold required taxes can trigger assessments and penalties even though the underlying wage remains a deductible business cost [4].
3. Criminal and civil immigration penalties remain a separate legal risk
Allowing the deduction of wages on a federal tax return does not immunize an employer from immigration enforcement or sanctions for hiring unauthorized workers. Federal immigration statutes permit fines and other penalties for knowingly employing unauthorized aliens, and memorandum-driven cooperation between the IRS and ICE increases the risk of coordinated payroll-focused enforcement actions and audits, which look beyond tax deductions to compliance with employment eligibility verification requirements and immigration law [5] [6]. Tax advisers emphasize that deductibility and immigration liability operate on parallel tracks: a deductible wage can still expose an employer to non-tax penalties, and the IRS may assess payroll tax liabilities where wages were not properly reported or where withholding obligations were neglected [4].
4. Practical compliance: reporting, documentation, and audit exposure
Tax practitioners stress that the safest position for an employer claiming a wage deduction paid to an unauthorized worker is to ensure meticulous payroll documentation, timely Forms W-2 and 1099 where appropriate, proper withholding and deposit of employment taxes, and accurate worker classification. The IRS has signaled that payroll audits will increasingly intersect with immigration enforcement through interagency understandings, heightening the likelihood that tax reporting irregularities will provoke broader investigations [5] [6]. While federal tax law generally allows the ordinary and necessary business expense deduction for wages, audit risk rises sharply when an employer fails to meet reporting or withholding duties, and employers should weigh that compliance burden alongside any legal counsel advice about immigration risk [2] [7].
5. Bottom line and what decision-makers should weigh
The legal consensus in the sources reviewed is clear: federal tax law permits deduction of wages paid for bona fide services even when the employee is undocumented, and state efforts to deny such deductions have been vulnerable to preemption challenges; however, deductibility does not eliminate exposure to immigration fines, criminal liability, or enhanced audit scrutiny tied to inadequate reporting and withholding practices [1] [2] [4]. Employers must treat the issue as twofold: claim the federal wage deduction only when compensation is legitimate and fully documented, and simultaneously address immigration compliance and rigorous payroll reporting to avoid parallel enforcement actions—the tax benefit does not excuse noncompliance with immigration or payroll-tax obligations [3] [5].