Which food manufacturers are actively partnering with 3d food-printing startups?

Checked on December 5, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Several established food-service operators and manufacturers are already partnering with 3D food‑printing vendors as the sector moves from novelty to commercial pilots: examples in reporting include SavorEat’s multi‑year collaboration with Sodexo and Redefine Meat’s rapid restaurant roll‑out tied to hospitality partners such as Greene King [1] [2]. Market reports and industry analyses list incumbent players (ByFlow, Natural Machines, BeeHex, 3D Systems, TNO) as active in commercial partnerships with culinary schools, hospitality chains, supermarkets and foodservice operators—evidence that manufacturers and food operators are the main collaborators cited in recent coverage [3] [4] [5].

1. Big foodservice groups are the first, not FMCG giants

Most concrete, named collaborations in the available reporting involve foodservice and catering organizations rather than global packaged‑food conglomerates: SavorEat has a documented partnership with Sodexo that produced a 3D‑printed plant‑based burger robot used in university dining (University of Denver) following their 2021 tie‑up [1]. Redefine Meat’s expansion into thousands of restaurants and a strategic link with Greene King underscores hospitality chains as early commercial partners [2]. Market narratives emphasize partnerships with hospitality chains, culinary schools and supermarket pilots as the primary route to market [3] [4].

2. 3D printer makers cultivate culinary and institutional partners

Vendors such as ByFlow and Natural Machines are repeatedly named in market reports as expanding partnerships with culinary schools, hospitality chains and commercial kitchens to scale adoption and train chefs [3] [5]. Reports highlight strategic collaborations between 3D‑printer manufacturers and local food brands or culinary institutions as a deliberate go‑to‑market play to adapt the tech to menu needs and accelerate penetration [6] [7].

3. Healthcare, eldercare and institutional nutrition as an emerging partner set

Industry analyses and materials‑market forecasts point to trials of 3D‑printed personalized nutrition for hospitals, fitness and eldercare settings—signaling manufacturers of medical nutrition and institutional caterers as another collaborating cohort [8] [7]. Reports cite expansion of personalized nutrition pilots for therapeutic and institutional use as a distinct application driving partnerships [8] [7].

4. Supermarkets and retail pilots are being used to validate scale economics

Several market briefings and press summaries note "commercial partnerships with supermarkets" as validation milestones for printed‑food economic viability—though the sources name supermarkets in general terms rather than listing multiple specific fast‑moving consumer goods (FMCG) firms [4]. That framing suggests retailers are involved in pilot or limited distribution tests; available sources do not provide an exhaustive list of supermarket chains or packaged‑food manufacturers by name [4].

5. National labs, research institutes and public–private consortia play a role

Public research organizations such as TNO and university groups are prominent collaborators with 3D food‑printing firms and with industry, particularly around plant‑protein texturization and scale‑up for meat analogues [9] [10]. Reports point to joint development work—e.g., TNO and Wageningen University research—to make plant proteins behave more like meat in printed products, indicating research institutions partner closely with both startups and food manufacturers [9] [10].

6. Market reports list active companies but often lack granular counter‑party names

Multiple market research pieces catalogue active technology vendors (ByFlow, Natural Machines, BeeHex, 3D Systems, Redefine Meat, SavorEat, TNO) and say partnerships with hospitality, culinary schools and retailers are widespread [5] [3] [4]. However, these same reports frequently summarize partner types (supermarkets, hospitality chains, healthcare providers) without naming many large packaged‑food manufacturers or detailed commercial counterparties beyond Sodexo and Greene King [1] [2]. In short: the ecosystem actors are documented, but public reporting is selective on corporate counterpart identities [3] [4].

7. What this implies for someone tracking manufacturer deals

To map which food manufacturers are actively partnering with 3D‑printing startups today, primary sources to watch are: announcements from printer startups (ByFlow, Natural Machines, SavorEat, Redefine Meat), procurement or innovation teams at large foodservice operators (Sodexo) and hospitality groups (Greene King), research institutes (TNO, Wageningen), and supermarket pilot press releases—because market analyses aggregate activity but often omit granular corporate names [1] [2] [9] [3].

Limitations and next steps: the available sources establish clear activity among 3D‑printer vendors, hospitality/catering groups and research institutes but rarely enumerate a broad roster of global packaged‑food manufacturers as named partners; locating a fuller list requires scanning company pressrooms and targeted partner announcements from the named startups and the major retailers or manufacturers themselves [3] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
Which major food brands have announced pilots with 3D food-printing startups in 2024-2025?
What products (meat, chocolate, bakery, dairy) are companies creating via 3D food printing partnerships?
How do food safety and regulatory approvals affect manufacturer-startup 3D-printed food collaborations?
Which 3D food-printing startups have secured commercial contracts or co-development deals with CPG companies?
What are the commercial motivations and cost implications for food manufacturers working with 3D food-printing firms?