Fact check: A LinkedIn post by GardaWorld showed they were hiring for these jobs a month ago, NBC6 reported, offering $26 per hour.

1. Summary of the results

The analyses reveal significant contradictions to the claim that GardaWorld was offering $26 per hour positions. Multiple sources indicate that GardaWorld's typical pay rates are substantially lower than the claimed amount.

Pay rate discrepancies identified:

• Security officers at GardaWorld typically earn an average of $16.43 per hour, while armed security officers earn $15.24 per hour ^[1]
• Discussion forums reveal that most GardaWorld positions in relevant areas pay between $11-$13 per hour for unarmed guards, with armed guards earning $18-$24 per hour ^[2]
• One source reported an average hourly wage range of $15-$18 for security positions ^[3]

Notable inconsistency: One source reported an average hourly salary of $61 per hour for GardaWorld employees ^[4], though this figure appears to be an outlier and may not represent typical security positions.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement lacks crucial context about GardaWorld's standard compensation structure. The analyses reveal that $26 per hour would represent a significant premium above typical industry rates for this company.

Missing information includes:

• Geographic variations in pay rates that could explain higher compensation in specific markets
• Specialized positions or requirements that might justify premium pay rates
• Verification of the NBC6 report - none of the sources directly confirm this specific news report or LinkedIn posting
• Timing context - while the claim mentions "a month ago," the analyses don't provide dated information to verify recent postings

Alternative explanations:

• The $26 rate might apply to specialized or supervisory positions rather than standard security roles
• Regional market conditions could drive higher wages in specific areas
• The posting might have been for temporary or high-risk assignments commanding premium rates

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The statement presents a specific wage claim without sufficient verification. The analyses suggest this figure is inconsistent with established pay patterns at GardaWorld.

Potential issues identified:

• Unverified source attribution - while citing NBC6, none of the analyses confirm this reporting
• Lack of context about position type, location, or special requirements that might justify the higher rate
• Possible misrepresentation of typical GardaWorld compensation, as multiple sources indicate significantly lower standard rates ^{[2] [1]}

The substantial gap between the claimed $26 per hour and the documented average rates of $11-$18 per hour suggests either the original statement refers to an exceptional circumstance not captured in standard salary data, or contains inaccurate information about typical GardaWorld compensation.