Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the differences in fees between GoFundMe and competitors like Kickstarter?
Executive Summary
GoFundMe and Kickstarter use different fee models that shape which campaigns they suit: GoFundMe commonly applies per-donation processing fees and optional platform tips, while Kickstarter charges a platform cut plus payment processing only when a project succeeds [1] [2]. Competing platforms such as Indiegogo, Zeffy, Givebutter, and niche equity or investor-focused services vary widely from zero platform fees for nonprofits to double-digit combined costs, meaning fee choice depends on campaign type, success model, and nonprofit status [3] [4] [5].
1. Why fee structure matters: dollars lost per donation versus all-or-nothing risk
Different platforms shift cost burdens in different ways. GoFundMe’s model centers on per-donation processing and optional platform percentages, with figures reported ranging from 2.2% + $0.30 up to examples of 2.9–7.9% + $0.30 when tips or platform fees are counted, which affects each individual gift immediately [3] [6]. Kickstarter’s model imposes a 5% platform fee plus a 3–5% payment processing fee, but crucially only if the campaign reaches its funding goal under an all-or-nothing structure — meaning backers’ payments are charged (and fees applied) only upon success, protecting creators from paying platform cuts on failed efforts [1]. This structural difference changes calculus: recurring small donations are costlier per-unit on fee-heavy platforms, whereas all-or-nothing projects face aggregate platform cuts only on success.
2. How nonprofits and tip-based platforms change the calculus
Nonprofit-focused options and tipping models alter effective costs dramatically. Zeffy is presented as a 0% platform-fee option that covers payment processing for nonprofits, allowing organizers to receive 100% of donations, while Givebutter operates on a tipping model where donors can optionally cover platform costs [3] [4]. These alternatives present a clear trade-off: platforms that advertise “free” fundraising often rely on voluntary donor tips or restricted eligibility for nonprofits, which can lower explicit fees but may shift reliance to donor goodwill or limit use to registered charitable entities. Campaign organizers should weigh the certainty of fixed fees against possible donor reluctance to tip.
3. Competitors broaden the spectrum: flat-percentage, per-transaction, and equity fees
Beyond the consumer crowdfunding space, platforms aimed at startups, investments, or specialized campaigns carry substantially different fee regimes. Indiegogo and some crowdfunding services are reported at around 8% + transaction fees, while equity or investment platforms like Wefunder, Republic, StartEngine, and SeedInvest charge placement or percentage fees often in the 4.9%–12% range, plus equity components or additional charges, creating materially higher effective costs for capital raises [6] [5]. These competitors make clear that campaign purpose—donation, rewards, or securities—largely dictates fee norms, and that fees for investor-backed campaigns include regulatory and brokerage-like charges absent from peer donation platforms.
4. Comparing headline numbers: frequent contradictions in secondary sources
Reported fee figures in the analyses vary and sometimes conflict: one set shows GoFundMe charging 5% + 3% processing while another lists 2.9% + $0.30 or a 2.2% + $0.30 processing rate depending on context and whether tips apply [1] [6] [3]. Kickstarter’s platform fee is consistently noted at 5% with 3–5% payment processing, but the presence of per-pledge or flat-per-transaction math (e.g., $.20 or $.30 increments) differs across reports [1] [6]. These discrepancies reflect different timeframes, campaign types (charity vs. rewards), and whether tips or nonprofit discounts are included, underscoring the need for campaign organizers to consult each platform’s live terms before budgeting.
5. Practical takeaways and hidden considerations campaigners often miss
Fees are only one part of net proceeds: payment processing, chargebacks, currency conversion, and conditional refunds can reduce funds beyond headline platform percentages, and nonprofit-specific waivers or tip-dependence can hide trade-offs between reliability and lower explicit fees [3] [2]. Platforms with all-or-nothing funding protect creators from per-campaign losses but can increase risk of receiving nothing if goals aren’t hit, while per-donation services deliver partial funding minus immediate fees. Given the varied reporting and specialized alternatives documented, organizers should match platform mechanics to campaign goals, verify current fee schedules, and consider donor behavior around tips or transaction sizes when estimating net revenue [1] [7].