Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Can employers legally hire undocumented immigrants without an SSN and how are payroll taxes handled?
Executive Summary
Employers may not lawfully "knowingly" hire undocumented workers; federal law requires verification of employment eligibility via Form I-9 and carries civil and criminal penalties for deliberate noncompliance, though enforcement and defenses for good-faith errors exist. Payroll and tax reporting duties persist regardless of an individual’s immigration status: employers must collect withholding and report wages, and the IRS provides mechanisms—such as ITINs, backup withholding, and specific rules for nonresident aliens—to handle tax reporting when an SSN is unavailable [1] [2] [3] [4]. This analysis synthesizes enforcement rules, tax procedures, and practical compliance steps, highlights tensions between immigration and tax systems, and flags where sources report different emphases—penalty risk on the immigration side versus tax-reporting pathways on the revenue side [5] [6].
1. Why employers can’t simply ignore work authorization — penalties and the I-9 trap
Federal law makes it unlawful for an employer to knowingly hire or continue to employ unauthorized workers; DHS and ICE investigations can impose civil money penalties and, in egregious cases, criminal sanctions. The Form I-9 regime creates a legal duty: employers must examine documents showing identity and work authorization of every newly hired worker and retain verification forms, and enforcement actions can result in substantial fines as illustrated by high-profile penalties and guidance on rising I-9 fines [1] [2]. A good-faith compliance defense exists for technical or procedural errors, but repeated failures or evidence of knowing employment of unauthorized workers removes that protection and exposes employers to enhanced penalties and potential criminal exposure [1]. Employers face significant immigration-enforcement risk if they circumvent the I-9 process or knowingly hire undocumented workers [5].
2. Tax responsibilities do not depend on immigration status — withholding and reporting duties
Employers must withhold federal income tax, Social Security, and Medicare taxes from wages regardless of an employee’s immigration status, and must report wages using employer tax returns such as Form 941 and wage statements such as Form W-2. State rules mirror federal obligations in many jurisdictions; employers cannot let immigration status excuse failure to remit payroll taxes [6]. When workers lack an SSN, the IRS allows use of an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) for tax reporting, but the ITIN does not confer work authorization; an employer may still be required to withhold taxes and report wages even without a traditional SSN on file [3] [4]. Failure to report correctly triggers IRS backup withholding rules: vendors or independent contractors who fail to provide a valid TIN may face a statutory 24% backup withholding rate on payments [4].
3. Independent contractors, 1099s, and the ITIN workaround — tax practice vs. legal risk
Hiring a worker as an independent contractor rather than an employee changes tax forms and withholding obligations but does not eliminate legal risk if the employer is effectively controlling the work or knowingly hiring someone unauthorized. Recent guidance explains that undocumented individuals can be paid on Form 1099, and employers can accept an ITIN for tax reporting purposes; however, employers must correctly classify workers to avoid misclassification penalties and IRS scrutiny that cross-checks 1099 filings against individual returns [4]. The IRS’s backup withholding procedures apply when a payee lacks a valid TIN, and the 24% withholding can materially affect payments to contractors [4]. The tension is clear: tax reporting pathways exist for persons without SSNs, but they do not negate immigration-law prohibitions or employer liability tied to hiring unauthorized workers [4] [3].
4. Special rules for nonresident aliens and treaty considerations — complications for withholding
Nonresident aliens are subject to distinct withholding rules: they generally cannot claim exempt on Form W-4 and may face different calculations or treaty-based exemptions that alter withholding and reporting obligations. Employers must follow separate procedures such as Forms W-4, 8233, and potentially Forms 1042/1042-S where treaty benefits apply, and may need to add amounts to wages for withholding calculations although that does not affect Social Security or Medicare taxes in the same way [7] [8]. This creates complexity where immigration status intersects tax residency rules, and employers must navigate dual regimes—immigration eligibility verification on one hand and nuanced IRS withholding rules on the other—to remain compliant [7] [8]. Missteps can prompt audits from both DHS and the IRS.
5. Practical bottom line — compliance roadmap and where risks remain
Employers must perform diligent Form I-9 verification and avoid knowingly hiring unauthorized workers to minimize immigration penalties; simultaneously, they must fulfill payroll-tax obligations and use ITINs or backup withholding rules when SSNs are absent, recognizing that an ITIN is for tax reporting only and does not authorize employment. Maintaining accurate records, seeking worker classification guidance, and consulting counsel or payroll specialists are essential because enforcement can arise from either DHS or the IRS, each with different remedies and penalties [1] [4] [3]. The core tension remains: tax systems provide reporting mechanisms for those without SSNs, but those mechanisms do not erase immigration-law prohibitions; employers who attempt to prioritize payroll convenience over legal verification risk substantial penalties and criminal exposure [5] [6].