Is factually.co owned by yahoo?
Executive summary
There is no evidence in the provided UK Companies House records that Factually.co — represented in corporate filings as FACTUALLY LIMITED — is owned by Yahoo; Companies House lists FACTUALLY LIMITED with a UK registration and registered office but does not show any connection to Yahoo in the documents supplied [1] [2]. The public record supplied here establishes an independent UK company identity for FACTUALLY LIMITED but these specific government pages do not speak to domain ownership, trademark arrangements, or off‑register corporate relationships; absent broader corporate records or statements from Yahoo, a claim that Yahoo owns Factually.co is unsupported by the supplied sources [1] [2].
1. What the official filing says about FACTUALLY LIMITED
The Companies House overview for FACTUALLY LIMITED shows a registered UK company with company number 10221837 and a registered office address at 16 Beaumont Street, Oxford, OX1 2NA, indicating a distinct legal entity recorded in the United Kingdom corporate registry [1]. The filing history page exists and catalogues filings for that company — a standard public transparency practice for UK companies — which supports the existence of an independently registered business entity named FACTUALLY LIMITED rather than, in itself, proving corporate ownership by an outside multinational [2].
2. What the record does not show — and why that matters
The Companies House pages provided record incorporation, officers and filings but do not include any documentary evidence tying FACTUALLY LIMITED to Yahoo or to Yahoo’s parent entities; those UK pages do not display a statement that Yahoo owns or controls the company and no such affiliation appears in the supplied overview or filing history [1] [2]. Corporate registries typically record direct corporate control only when formalized through shareholdings, parent company filings, or when a foreign entity registers as a UK establishment; none of those specific links appear in the supplied pages, so the absence of a Yahoo ownership notation in these documents is a substantive negative in the record but not definitive proof of absence beyond the scope of the supplied data [2] [1].
3. Alternate explanations and limits of the sourcing
Ownership of an internet domain or a brand can be structured in many ways — via separate holding companies, trademarks, licensing arrangements, or private shareholdings — that would not necessarily be recorded in a single national company register extract; the supplied Companies House pages establish FACTUALLY LIMITED as a UK-registered company at a given address but do not cover global trademark registries, domain registration WHOIS records, or corporate disclosures filed in jurisdictions outside the UK, so they cannot conclusively rule in or out indirect ties to Yahoo or another corporation [1] [2]. The supplied sources thus allow a firm statement only about what they show: a UK company exists in the name FACTUALLY LIMITED and the public filings are available for review [1] [2].
4. Bottom line: can one say “Factually.co is owned by Yahoo”?
Based on the supplied Companies House overview and filing-history pages there is no supporting evidence that Factually.co (as represented by FACTUALLY LIMITED in the UK register) is owned by Yahoo; the documents list a UK company and its filings without indicating Yahoo ownership, so the specific claim that Yahoo owns Factually.co is unsupported by these records [1] [2]. A definitive rebuttal or confirmation would require additional records — for example, a Yahoo corporate disclosure, domain registry data, or filings in other jurisdictions — which are not included in the provided sources, and therefore cannot be asserted here from the supplied material [2] [1].