Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Is "Morning Kick" just a scam?
Executive Summary
Morning Kick, a supplement sold by Roundhouse Provisions, is not proven to be a blanket “scam,” but the company shows a split record: strong positive user ratings and many testimonials on one side, and recurring complaints about subscriptions, deliveries, and customer service on the other. Consumer-reported patterns—difficulty canceling auto‑renewals, unexpected charges, and inconsistent refund resolution—are documented alongside a B+ BBB accreditation and predominantly positive product reviews, so the truth depends on whether your concern is product efficacy or business practices [1] [2] [3].
1. Allegations That Spark the “Scam” Label — What Customers Are Saying Loudest
Customers have repeatedly alleged unauthorized charges, trouble canceling subscriptions, and delivery failures, which are the kinds of complaints that drive the “scam” label in public discourse. Multiple complaint summaries show a pattern where consumers reported being charged for products they did not order or for ongoing shipments after they attempted to cancel, and many described protracted back-and‑forths to secure refunds or stop billing [2]. These operational failures create real financial and trust harms: when automated billing loops or opaque cancellation processes persist, affected customers reasonably conclude the company is acting in bad faith. At the same time, the company has responded to some complaints and issued refunds, indicating that while processes are breaking down repeatedly, some remediation occurs. Those two facts together explain why many reviews oscillate between calling Morning Kick a scam and acknowledging successful resolutions.
2. Positive Outcomes and Strong Ratings — Why Some People Defend the Product
Contrasting with complaints, large samples of user reviews report measurable benefits such as increased energy, digestive improvements, and weight loss, with one review aggregation showing 96% positive sentiment and overall high ratings, and other platforms listing an average near 4.7 out of 5 [1] [3]. These enthusiastic testimonials matter: they indicate the product has efficacy for a substantial subset of users, and they explain why the company maintains active, repeat customers. The presence of a 90‑day money‑back guarantee that the company cites in responses appears to mitigate some negative experiences where customers used the return policy to secure refunds. Nevertheless, positive user experiences do not erase legitimate service complaints; they simply show the issue is multifaceted—some people get the promised effects and reasonable service, others do not.
3. Business Practices Under Scrutiny — Subscriptions, Refunds, and Communication
A recurring theme across complaint summaries is opaque subscription mechanics and inconsistent customer support, which create procedural risk even if the product itself is satisfactory. Reports describe automatic renewals that customers did not expect, challenges canceling subscriptions, and delays or denials in processing refunds or deliveries [2]. The company’s engagement with complaints—apologizing, issuing refunds in some cases, and referencing the money‑back guarantee—shows attempts at remediation but also highlights inconsistent implementation. Those operational weaknesses are not unique in the supplement industry, yet they are precisely the kind of practices that lead consumers to distrust a brand; when combined with aggressive marketing or unclear checkout disclosures, perception quickly shifts from “poor service” to “scam.”
4. Official Credibility Signals and What They Mean — BBB Rating, Accreditation, and Responses
Roundhouse Provisions holds BBB accreditation with a B+ rating and thousands of reviews that the company and the BBB present as evidence of legitimacy, which cuts against claims that the business is an outright fraud [3]. Accreditation signals that the company has engaged with a consumer‑protection body and has responded to complaints, and the presence of many positive reviews corroborates a base of satisfied customers. However, accreditation is not a clean bill of operational perfection; it documents that disputes exist and that remediation has occurred in at least some instances. For a consumer, the BBB rating reduces—but does not eliminate—risk: it is a credibility signal, not a guarantee that subscription or customer service problems will not arise.
5. Final Assessment — Where Risk Lies and Practical Steps for Consumers
Morning Kick cannot be declared a universal scam based on the available mixture of documented service failures and abundant positive testimonials, but the company’s recurring operational complaints mean prospective buyers should exercise caution. Consumers should scrutinize checkout language for auto‑renewal terms, keep records of purchase and cancellation attempts, and use the 90‑day guarantee if results or service are unsatisfactory [2] [1]. Regulatory or third‑party investigations beyond BBB complaint mediation are not documented in these sources, so the debate is primarily about customer service practices rather than proven fraudulent conduct. Those prioritizing product efficacy may find value; those who cannot tolerate billing or refund risk should treat the purchase as higher‑risk or contact the company directly to get cancellation policy details in writing before buying [3] [2].