Does kogman and keisie ask for ID when paying cash

1. What the guest farm’s own website says about cash payments

Kogman & Keisie’s contact/FAQ page explicitly says they accept credit‑card payments and electronic funds transfers (ETF) and that “it’s possible to pay the remainder cash on arrival,” which indicates the property routinely accepts cash for at least part of the bill and for onsite balance settlement ^[1]. Their main site and booking pages also advertise paying by card or bank transfer and the ability to pay by cash on arrival ^{[5] [6] [1]}.

2. Third‑party booking sites: ID and cash deposits for incidentals

Hotel aggregators referencing Kogman & Keisie include a standard hotel policy line: “Government‑issued photo identification and a credit card, debit card, or cash deposit may be required at check‑in for incidental charges.” That language appears on the HotelFriend listing and is echoed by other reservation platforms that often include pre‑authorization or deposit clauses ^[2]. This wording is conditional (“may be required”) rather than categorical.

3. Multiple listings agree on payment options, not unanimity on ID policy

Several travel sites list cash, electronic transfers (EFT) and cards as accepted payment methods, confirming broad agreement that cash is accepted ^{[4] [3] [7]}. However, explicit statements about checking ID are less uniformly worded: some sites include the conditional incidental‑deposit/ID clause ^[2] while others simply list accepted payment methods without mentioning ID checks ^{[4] [3]}. That means available reporting documents payment methods clearly but gives mixed messages on a guaranteed ID requirement.

4. How to interpret “may be required” in practice

The conditional phrasing on booking pages is standard hotel language intended to cover situations where a property wants to secure incidental charges (damages, extras) and may request a card pre‑authorization or a cash deposit and ID at check‑in ^[2]. It does not prove Kogman & Keisie enforces ID checks for every cash payment; their own FAQ focuses on payment options and paying balances in cash, not on a blanket ID‑for‑cash policy ^[1].

5. What the evidence does not say (limitations)

Available sources do not state a firm, always‑applied policy that Kogman & Keisie will ask for ID specifically when guests pay in cash; the property’s FAQ only confirms cash as a possible payment method and third‑party sites use conditional language about ID/deposits for incidentals ^{[1] [2]}. There is no publicly posted, unambiguous statement from the guest farm requiring ID on all cash transactions in the provided sources ^{[1] [2] [4]}.

6. Practical advice based on the reporting

If you plan to pay cash, expect that Kogman & Keisie accepts cash payments and may accept final payment on arrival in cash ^{[1] [3]}. Also be prepared to present government‑issued photo identification and possibly leave a credit/debit card or cash deposit for incidentals, since booking platforms list that as a potential requirement ^[2]. To avoid surprises, the clearest next step is to contact the property directly via their contact page or phone number to confirm the check‑in ID and deposit practice for your booking ^{[1] [5]}.

7. Where reporting could be clearer and why it matters

Listing sites standardize language about deposits and ID, which protects both guest and property but can create ambiguity when property‑specific FAQs emphasize flexible payment options. That ambiguity matters for travelers who prefer anonymity or who arrive without cards: the property could accept cash balances but still ask for ID or a deposit in certain cases—details only the host can confirm ^{[1] [2]}.

Sources cited: Kogman & Keisie contact/FAQ and booking pages ^{[1] [6] [5]}, HotelFriend/reservation aggregator policy language ^[2], and multiple listing sites noting accepted cash/EFT/cards ^{[4] [3] [7]}.