Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: If i remember correctly there was a french company that paid ISIS hundreds of millions to keep their cement factory in Syria working, I think they go with the most evil 5 companies ever.
1. Summary of the results
The core claim about a French company paying ISIS is confirmed across multiple sources, though with some important clarifications about the amounts involved. Lafarge, a French cement company, did make payments to ISIS and other armed groups between 2013-2014 [1]. However, the total amounts varied across sources:
- Approximately $10.24 million to ISIS, al-Nusrah Front, and intermediaries [2]
- Up to 13 million euros ($17.5 million) to various armed groups [1] [1]
- Monthly "donations" of $816,000 [3]
The company pleaded guilty in U.S. courts and agreed to pay a $777.8 million penalty [1] [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several crucial details were omitted from the original statement:
- The payments were structured through a "revenue-sharing agreement" where more cement sold meant more money paid to ISIS [3]
- The company internally referred to these payments as "taxes" [2]
- The payments continued while ISIS was actively conducting violent activities, including kidnapping and killing Westerners [2]
- Lafarge is currently facing trial in Paris in addition to their U.S. conviction [4]
- The company has been charged with complicity in crimes against humanity [4]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement contains two main inaccuracies:
1. The claim of "hundreds of millions" is significantly overstated. The actual payments were in the tens of millions at most [1] [4] [2]
2. The statement about being "among the most evil 5 companies ever" is a subjective assessment, though the U.S. Attorney did describe this as a "staggering crime" and "the unthinkable choice" [2] [2]
It's worth noting that this case represents a significant example of corporate complicity with terrorism, where business interests were prioritized over humanitarian concerns. The legal proceedings and substantial financial penalty ($778 million) reflect the severity of these actions [4].