Lodging industry may avoid true price discovery for a second year
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Hotel transaction activity cooled through 2024–25, keeping many owners on the sidelines and delaying “price discovery” that usually comes from active sales; industry reports project modest revenue and ADR gains but note costs rising faster than revenue growth (AHLA) [1]. Analysts and practitioners say a wave of loan maturities and potential rate cuts could spur transactions and restore price discovery—however reporting shows deal activity remained subdued into 2025 even as RevPAR and ADR edged up (LARC, HospitalityNet, AHLA) [2] [3] [1].
1. Why “true price discovery” may have been deferred: transaction chill and financing stress
Multiple industry observers documented slower-than-normal deal flow and owner hesitancy amid higher borrowing costs and operating pressure, a combination that suppresses the number of arms‑length transactions needed to reveal market value—HospitalityNet warned that transaction activity was slow in late 2024 even as loan maturities loomed, implying price discovery had not fully resumed [3]. The AHLA’s industry report says hotels faced rising costs that outpaced revenue growth in 2024, a condition that can reduce seller confidence and complicate buyer underwriting [1].
2. Macroeconomics and interest rates: the conditional catalyst
Reports note that falling or stabilized interest rates are widely expected to be a trigger for increased deal activity; HospitalityNet and conference commentary linked anticipated Fed easing and maturing low‑rate loans with the prospect of “markedly” increased price discovery once financing conditions improve [3]. But industry coverage shows rate shifts were gradual and uneven in 2025, so the timing and scale of any rebound in transactions remained uncertain [4] [5].
3. Performance metrics: mixed operational signals muddy valuation
U.S. RevPAR and ADR were reported to be rising modestly—Lodging Analytics projected RevPAR growth into 2025 and some industry sources forecast ADR and RevPAR increases—yet occupancy levels and margin pressures varied across markets and chain scales, producing noisy comparables that make single‑price signals less reliable [2] [6]. The AHLA highlighted that costs rose faster than revenues in 2024, a structural squeeze that forces buyers and sellers to disagree on sustainable cash flows [1].
4. Segmentation matters: luxury vs. economy and independents vs. branded
Multiple sources show the lodging sector is bifurcated: luxury and upper‑upscale segments saw stronger performance and more development activity, while economy supply was flatter—this splits buyer appetite and yields different valuation dynamics by scale [5]. Smaller independent properties also face steeper technology and cost barriers, limiting the universality of pricing signals and slowing marketwide discovery [7] [8].
5. Technology, distribution and alternative accommodations tilt pricing dynamics
New pricing tools, richer data feeds and revenue‑management platforms are changing how large brands set rates, effectively shifting some discovery from transactions to dynamic yield engines—but many smaller hotels lag in adoption, which fragments pricing signals across the market [7]. The rise of alternative accommodations and direct‑booking pushes by major chains also alter competitive baselines that investors use when valuing assets [9] [7].
6. What to watch next: loan maturities, rate moves, and deal pipelines
Sources point to a handful of indicators that would restore clearer price discovery: increased transaction volume tied to loan maturities, visible rate cuts from the Fed that reinvigorate underwriting, and publicly reported trades that set fresh comps [3] [4]. PwC and market trackers suggested stabilization in H2 2025 could normalize development and investment behavior, but they caution the path will be gradual and market‑specific [5].
7. Competing viewpoints and the limits of current reporting
Some analysts and conference speakers voiced optimism that construction cost easing and eventual Fed easing would revive deals [4], while trade bodies and sector studies emphasized ongoing cost pressures and uneven recovery by segment [1] [5]. Available sources do not mention precise transaction volumes, a definitive timeline for rate cuts, or firm sales that would conclusively prove a second‑year avoidance of price discovery; those data gaps limit any definitive conclusion (not found in current reporting).
Conclusion: public reporting from industry groups and analysts paints a clear picture of constrained price discovery through 2024–25 caused by financing stress, cost pressure and uneven performance across segments, but it also identifies plausible catalysts that could restore transactions. Watch loan maturities, Fed action, and the next tranche of institutional sales for the market signal that true price discovery has resumed [3] [1] [2].