How did MC2 Model Management operate in New York and Miami?

1. What people claimed MC2 did in plain terms — a compact inventory of assertions that matter

The primary claims about MC2 Model Management describe it as a full‑service modeling agency founded in 2004 that maintained offices in New York, Miami, and Tel Aviv, representing both fashion and commercial talent and offering casting, styling, and production services. The agency reportedly ran public open calls and appointment‑only interviews, targeted talent from about age 14 upward with standard height expectations for women, and served as a placement hub for runway, editorial, and print campaigns ^{[1] [4]}. Parallel claims identify Jean‑Luc Brunel as the founder and link MC2 to alleged criminal networks; those claims include media reporting that assets associated with MC2’s New York operation were sold and that Miami assets were being transferred to other agencies, a narrative that complicates the firm’s ordinary commercial profile ^{[3] [5]}.

2. How MC2 presented and operated in New York — what the records show

Public directory entries and mapping listings identify a New York address at 6 West 14th Street, where MC2 ran an office functioning as a conventional agency handling model rosters, bookings, and client relations. That New York branch is described as organizing campaigns and runway placements, maintaining contact details and a staffed office, and positioning itself amid the city’s fashion ecosystem as a professional intermediary between talent and buyers ^{[6] [1] [7]}. Reports also state the New York office sold assets in 2017 to a different agency, which suggests a change in operational control or brand presence there; this sale is reported alongside allegations about the founder, which does not by itself prove operational wrongdoing but signals significant organizational transitions and reputational risk ^[3].

3. How MC2 operated in Miami — regional role and footprint

Sources list a Miami Beach office at 1674 Alton Road, Suite 500, and describe the Miami location as a South Beach boutique serving as a regional hub for scouting and representing talent across the southeastern United States. The Miami operation is portrayed as performing the same core agency functions as New York—scouting, talent development, booking for print, editorial, runway, and commercial work—while leveraging Miami’s seasonal and market‑specific demand for swimwear and lifestyle campaigns ^{[2] [7]}. Directory descriptions emphasize service parity across cities, with Miami positioned to capture local clients and talent pipelines; contemporaneous reports, however, describe efforts to transfer Miami assets to another company, reflecting organizational flux that could affect ongoing operations and client relationships ^[3].

4. The shadow of allegations — what reporting connected to the founder means for operations

Multiple sources connect MC2’s founder Jean‑Luc Brunel to allegations of sexual abuse and ties to Jeffrey Epstein, reporting arrests and litigation culminating in Brunel’s death in custody in 2022; these developments overlay the agency’s normal commercial activities with serious criminal allegations and reputational consequences ^{[5] [8]}. Investigative reporting and industry notices indicate former models and employees have alleged abusive conduct, and later reporting documents that Brunel’s modeling assets were sold or being transferred to other agencies—transactions framed in media as attempts to distance brand elements from controversy. The existence of transfers and sales does not by itself establish illegality in the agency’s day‑to‑day bookings, but it does create regulatory and reputational questions that affected how MC2 operated publicly and with clients ^{[3] [8]}.

5. What remains unresolved and where the record is strongest — the balanced takeaways

The strongest, best‑documented facts are the dual‑city presence and routine agency services in New York and Miami: fixed addresses, service descriptions, and listings in industry directories establish MC2 as an operational modeling agency ^{[6] [1] [2]}. The more contested and complex claims involve Brunel’s alleged criminal conduct and reported asset transfers; these are documented in investigative reporting and later accounts of sales/transfers, which explain why agency operations in both cities underwent change or rebranding ^{[3] [5]}. Critical open questions include the precise timing and terms of asset sales, the continuity of client and model relationships during transitions, and the extent to which alleged misconduct affected specific bookings—matters that require corporate records, legal filings, or further contemporaneous reporting to resolve fully ^{[3] [5]}.