What is memyts’s valuation history and notable investors’ stakes?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available search results do not contain any reporting that directly details the valuation history or notable investors’ stakes for a company named “memyts.” PitchBook entries for similarly named companies (Memsys, Memetrics, Memomics) exist but require access; none of the provided results give a clear valuation timeline or cap table for “memyts” [1] [2] [3]. Because the sources do not mention “memyts” specifically, this note limits what can be asserted with confidence [1].
1. What the public record here actually shows
The search results include PitchBook company profile links for MEMSYS and Memetrics that promise valuation, funding and investor details behind paywalls, but those pages do not publish the data in the snippets provided [1] [2]. The PitchBook summaries note that full investor histories and cap-table details require access, so public summaries in these results are incomplete and not a substitute for direct reporting [1] [2].
2. The gap: “memyts” is not found in these sources
None of the supplied links or snippets refer to a company or brand called “memyts.” The sources instead reference other similarly spelled names (Memsys, Memetrics) and unrelated items (a nootropic product called Memyts Capsules, meme-coin/meme-stock coverage, and unrelated equity pages) — but none provide valuation history or investor stakes for an entity named “memyts” [1] [2] [4] [5]. Therefore, available sources do not mention valuation rounds, prices, or investor percentages for “memyts” [1] [2] [4] [5].
3. Items that look similar but are different — why confusion can arise
The results include a PitchBook profile for “MEMSYS” that explicitly offers valuation and cap-table information to subscribers, which could be mistaken for “memyts” if queried informally [1]. Another PitchBook entry is for “Memetrics” [2]. There is also a product review for “Memyts Capsules,” a consumer supplement — not an equity or startup report — and media listings about meme-stocks and unrelated corporate valuations like Meta’s, further increasing ambiguity in a keyword search [4] [5] [6].
4. How investors’ stake information usually appears — and what’s missing here
Public disclosure of investor stakes typically appears in regulatory filings (SEC, stock exchange prospectuses) or detailed media reporting and database entries (Crunchbase, PitchBook) that include round-by-round ownership tables. The PitchBook links in the search results indicate those databases may hold such records for similarly named firms, but the snippets show the data are behind access controls and therefore not present in the provided material [1] [2]. For “memyts,” no such filings or press coverage are cited in the supplied results, so those standard evidence types are absent [1] [2].
5. Competing explanations and alternative leads
There are three plausible reasons the search returned no valuation history for “memyts”: (a) the company name is spelled differently in investor records (e.g., MEMSYS, Memetrics), (b) “memyts” is an early-stage private entity with no public disclosures yet, or (c) the query actually pertains to a non-equity product (Memyts Capsules). The provided sources support (a) and (c) by showing near-matching names and unrelated product pages, while they do not directly confirm (b) because they contain no private-deal reporting on “memyts” [1] [2] [4].
6. Next steps to get authoritative valuation and stake figures
To answer your question precisely, obtain one of these sources: the company’s IPO prospectus or S-1 (if public), a press release announcing a funding round, an accredited database report (PitchBook/Crunchbase with full entries), or regulatory filings where major investors’ stakes are listed. The PitchBook snippets indicate those databases likely contain the information for similarly named firms but require subscription access [1] [2]. Available sources do not provide a direct link to such documents for “memyts” [1] [2].
7. Important limitations and how I treated them
I relied only on the search results you supplied. Because none of those results contains a valuation timeline or cap-table for “memyts,” I did not invent figures or attribute stakes that are not in the material. The conclusion that “available sources do not mention [memyts]” follows from the absence of any direct reference in the provided snippets [1] [2] [4].
If you can supply a corrected company name, a link to an investor deck, an S-1, or an article that actually profiles “memyts,” I will extract and summarize the valuation rounds and notable investors’ stakes from that material and cite it precisely [1] [2].