Has Mercor been involved in any high-profile class-action lawsuits?

1. Mercor at the center of a high‑profile trade‑secrets suit

In early September 2025, Scale AI filed a federal complaint in San Francisco alleging Mercor and a former Scale employee, Eugene Ling, misappropriated trade secrets to win business, seeking damages and injunctions to bar use or disclosure of the alleged material ^{[1] [3]}. National outlets including Bloomberg and Axios reported the suit as significant because it involves one of the industry’s largest players and describes hundreds of purported proprietary customer strategy documents copied to a personal Google Drive and later tied to Mercor’s business development ^{[1] [3]}.

2. Why that suit is “high‑profile” — and what it is not

Coverage of the Scale v. Mercor dispute was broad across tech and business press, with TechCrunch, Inc., Silicon Valley Voice and others highlighting the stakes: Scale framed the suit as protecting trade secrets and customer relationships, and alleged the documents could serve as a “roadmap” for unfair competition ^{[4] [5] [6]}. That pattern of national reporting and the involvement of a high‑value rival make the case high‑profile in the sense of public visibility and industry consequence ^{[4] [5]}. However, it is a traditional civil action for misappropriation and breach of contract, not a class‑action lawsuit brought on behalf of a class of plaintiffs; Scale is an individual corporate plaintiff pursuing remedies against a competitor and a former employee ^{[1] [3]}.

3. Class‑action exposure: ambiguous signals from labor‑law solicitations

There is at least some public indication that Mercor appears in legal marketing for potential class claims about worker classification and pay: a plaintiffs’ firm’s landing page lists Mercor among companies that allegedly misclassified AI data‑labelers and taskers as independent contractors, implying potential classwide wage and expense claims ^[2]. That listing is an invitation to contact counsel, not coverage of a litigated, court‑certified class‑action complaint; the source is a law firm page designed to recruit claimants, which can reflect plaintiff interest but does not confirm a filed, high‑profile class action against Mercor ^[2].

4. Evaluating credibility and agendas in reporting

Media reports frame the Scale suit as a major competitive escalation, but readers should note potential agendas: trade‑press outlets highlight industry rivalry and investor stakes, while law‑firm pages seek claimants and may overstate the imminence of class litigation ^{[4] [2]}. Mercor’s public responses quoted in reporting deny knowingly using Scale’s secrets and say any old documents were on a former employee’s personal drive and under investigation, a standard defensive posture that questions whether Mercor actively benefited from the alleged downloads ^[3]. Scale’s demand that Mercor produce inventories of files and block the employee from working with a particular customer underscores the business harm it alleges, but those are allegations that courts will have to resolve ^{[4] [6]}.

5. Bottom line: answer to the core question

Has Mercor been involved in any high‑profile class‑action lawsuits? Based on available reporting, Mercor has been a defendant in at least one high‑profile civil lawsuit (Scale’s trade‑secrets suit) that attracted national coverage, but evidence that Mercor has been the target of a prominent, filed class‑action lawsuit is limited to a plaintiffs’ law‑firm outreach page suggesting potential class claims about worker misclassification rather than a reported, court‑filed class action; there is no corroborating press coverage showing a litigated, high‑profile class‑action against Mercor as of the cited sources ^{[1] [2] [4]}.