Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
When was Neurocept incorporated and in what city/state?
Executive Summary
Neurocept’s incorporation history is ambiguous because multiple legally distinct entities share the name “Neurocept,” each with different incorporation dates and jurisdictions. The documents and analyses supplied identify at least four separate registrations: Neurocept Limited (UK) incorporated 20 November 2015 in Birmingham, UK; an Alabama Neurocept, Inc. incorporated 2 February 1999 in Lauderdale County; a California Neurocept Inc. formed August 2018 in San Luis Obispo, CA; and a Neurocept, LLC with activity in Louisiana dated 10 June 2016. Public profiles and product marketing sometimes refer to a New York City base for a consumer product called Neurocept, further complicating attribution between corporate entities and trademarked product names [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Picking Apart Conflicting Corporate Records: Multiple Neurocepts in Official Filings
The available analyses strongly indicate that “Neurocept” is not a single corporate identity but a name used by multiple, separately incorporated organizations across jurisdictions, which explains why simple queries return inconsistent answers. The UK company register entry records Neurocept Limited incorporated 20 November 2015 with a registered office in Birmingham, West Midlands (Trafalgar House, 261 Alcester Road South) [1]. Separately, filings or business-record summaries identify an Alabama incorporation dated 2 February 1999 in Lauderdale County, with a principal address in Leighton, Alabama, and a California startup listing claims a San Luis Obispo incorporation in August 2018 operating as a C‑corp [2] [3]. These disparate records show clear legal separations: different incorporation dates, addresses, and corporate forms, which means any single answer about “when Neurocept was incorporated and where” must first specify which legal entity is being referenced [1] [2] [3].
2. Why public-facing product pages and press blur corporate identity
Public marketing and product launch announcements introduce further confusion because consumer-facing branding often references a city or market base that does not equal the corporate incorporation address. One product announcement says Neurocept “is based in New York City” and references a U.S. market launch, but that source does not supply incorporation paperwork tying the brand to a New York‑incorporated entity [4]. The official product site similarly focuses on ingredients, benefits and sales, not corporate registry details [5]. This pattern—marketing naming a city for brand or operational HQ while legal incorporation remains elsewhere or in multiple places—is common and explains why different public records and promotional materials point to different cities and dates [4] [5].
3. Independent verification hits dead ends and partial confirmations
Attempts to corroborate a single canonical incorporation hit obstacles: the Better Business Bureau profile for a Neurocept in Aurora, Colorado returned an HTTP 403 error so its records were not accessible, while other data aggregators and public registry searches returned multiple entries matching the Neurocept name but tied to separate filings. The most concrete single datum that appears consistently in the collected analyses is the Alabama incorporation dated 2 February 1999 and the UK incorporation on 20 November 2015, with California filings in August 2018 also documented in startup directories [2] [1] [3]. This mixed evidentiary picture means no single “incorporation” date or city/state can be asserted as definitive without specifying the corporate registration referenced [2] [1] [3].
4. Multiple viewpoints and likely agendas in the sources
The datasets include official government registry extracts (UK), commercial startup directories (California), aggregated business‑record analyses, and marketing materials, each with distinct incentives. Government registry pages aim to be definitive for the entity they cover [1]. Startup directories and aggregators present company profiles that may use self‑reported founding dates or incorporation filings but can conflate operational founding with legal formation [3]. Marketing and product sites prioritize brand positioning and sales over legal detail [4] [5]. Given these differing agendas, apparent contradictions reflect different kinds of records—not necessarily errors—so confirming the precise incorporation requires consulting the specific jurisdiction’s company registry for the entity of interest [1] [3] [4] [5].
5. What to do next to get a definitive answer
To resolve which Neurocept entity you mean and obtain authoritative incorporation details, consult the specific public registry for the jurisdiction where you believe the company was formed: Companies House for the UK, state Secretary of State records for Alabama and California, and relevant Louisiana registry or NPI for healthcare entities. The analyses here point to verifiable registry entries: 20 November 2015 (Neurocept Limited, Birmingham), 2 February 1999 (Neurocept, Inc., Lauderdale County, Alabama), and August 2018 (Neurocept Inc., San Luis Obispo, CA), plus an NPI‑dated Louisiana LLC record [1] [2] [3]. If you specify which Neurocept — the UK limited, the Alabama corporation, the California startup, or the Louisiana LLC — I will extract the exact registry citation and provide a primary‑source link and document IDs for definitive confirmation [1] [2] [3].