Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How does New Era Protect compare to other similar protection services?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, there appears to be confusion regarding the specific product being referenced. The sources reveal information about ERA Protect (not "New Era Protect" as stated in the original question), which is a smart home security system offering comprehensive protection services [1] [2] [3].
ERA Protect features include:
- Smart alarm system with wireless siren
- Floodlight cameras and PIR motion sensors
- Professional monitoring services
- Smart home compatibility and user-friendly app
- BSI IoT Security Kitemark certification [2] [3]
The system receives mixed customer feedback with an overall rating of 3.9 out of 5 on Trustpilot and is described as "Great" by reviewers [4]. ERA Protect is recommended by Neighbourhood Watch and offers a free trial period [3].
However, no direct comparisons to other similar protection services were found in the analyses of ERA Protect sources [1] [5] [4]. One source does provide comparative information about competing home security systems like SimpliSafe, Vivint, ADT, Cove, Abode, Frontpoint, and Ring, with SimpliSafe being recommended as the best overall home security system for 2025 due to its affordable pricing and easy DIY setup [6].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks crucial context about which specific product is being referenced. The analyses reveal that sources about "New Era Technology" refer to a completely different company offering video collaboration and unified communications solutions, not security services [7] [8] [9].
Key missing information includes:
- Specific pricing comparisons between ERA Protect and competitors
- Detailed feature-by-feature analysis against similar systems
- Contract requirements and potential drawbacks that may affect consumer choice [2]
- Independent third-party security testing results beyond the BSI certification
The analyses suggest that security companies benefit financially from emphasizing their unique features and certifications without providing transparent comparisons to competitors. Companies like SimpliSafe, Vivint, and ADT would benefit from consumers not having access to comprehensive comparative data [6].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement contains a factual error by referring to "New Era Protect" when the actual product appears to be "ERA Protect." This naming confusion could mislead consumers seeking accurate information about security services.
The question assumes the existence of readily available comparative data, but the analyses reveal that ERA Protect sources focus primarily on promoting their own features rather than providing objective comparisons [1] [2] [3]. This represents a common industry bias where companies highlight their strengths without acknowledging competitor advantages.
Additionally, the framing suggests that comprehensive comparisons are easily accessible, when in reality, consumers must rely on third-party review sites like SafeWise to obtain comparative analysis of multiple security systems [6]. This information gap benefits established security companies who can control their marketing narratives without direct competitive pressure.