Fact check: What are the ratings and reviews of New Era Protect on consumer review websites?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available analyses, New Era Protect appears to receive predominantly positive reviews across multiple consumer review platforms and health websites. The product, which is a dietary supplement designed to support women's urinary health and bladder control, has garnered favorable feedback from customers reporting improvements in their conditions ^{[1] [2]}.

Key findings from consumer reviews include:

• Customers report improvements in bladder control and comfort after using the supplement ^[1]
• Users have experienced reduced urgency and improved overall quality of life ^[3]
• The product has received positive testimonials from satisfied customers across multiple review sources ^{[2] [3]}
• Reviews highlight the supplement's ability to support urinary health, strengthen pelvic floor muscles, and promote overall wellness ^{[4] [5]}

However, there is one notable discrepancy: one source references "ERA Protect" (without "New") which appears to be a different product entirely, rated 3.9 out of 5 stars on Trustpilot with mixed reviews including some customers experiencing technical issues and dissatisfaction ^[6].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks several important contextual elements that would provide a more complete picture:

• No specific rating scores or numerical data are provided in most analyses, making it difficult to quantify the actual consumer satisfaction levels
• Limited information about negative reviews or complaints - while sources mention "honest consumer complaints," the specific nature and frequency of these complaints are not detailed ^[3]
• Technical and delivery issues are mentioned but not elaborated upon, such as "technical problems with ordering and delivery" ^[3]
• The company's response to negative feedback and how they handle customer service issues is not addressed
• Comparison with competitor products in the same market segment is absent
• Long-term effectiveness data and whether initial positive results are sustained over time

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself appears neutral and factual, simply requesting information about ratings and reviews. However, the sources analyzed may contain inherent bias:

• Multiple sources appear to be promotional or affiliate-based content rather than independent consumer review platforms, as evidenced by their detailed ingredient breakdowns and overwhelmingly positive tone ^{[1] [4] [2] [3] [5]}
• The company and supplement manufacturers would benefit financially from positive reviews and testimonials being prominently featured
• Potential confusion between similar product names (New Era Protect vs. ERA Protect) could mislead consumers about actual product performance ^[6]
• The absence of major consumer review platforms like Amazon, Consumer Reports, or Better Business Bureau ratings suggests the available information may not represent the full spectrum of consumer experiences
• Money-back guarantees and quality commitments mentioned in sources ^[3] could be marketing tactics rather than genuine indicators of product effectiveness