Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How has the Open Society Foundations' funding evolved over the years since its inception?
Executive Summary
The Open Society Foundations (OSF) have grown from a focused philanthropic initiative into a multi-billion-dollar global grantmaker, with reported cumulative expenditures exceeding $24 billion and founder George Soros’s contributions cited as more than $32 billion since the late 20th century, reflecting sustained, large-scale funding expansion and strategic diversification [1] [2]. Annual finances show volatility and growth — revenues reported between roughly $155.6 million in 2013 and $988.4 million in 2021, with expenses likewise rising in recent years and a stated $1.2 billion in expenditures for 2024, indicating both step-changes in annual disbursement and a trend toward larger, programmatic investments globally [3] [1].
1. How the Size and Scale Have Changed — Numbers Tell a Big Story
Financial records and organizational statements present a consistent picture of major scaling over decades: cumulative expenditures since OSF’s inception top $24 billion, while reports attribute more than $32 billion in funding contributions from George Soros dating back to the organization’s early phases, signaling a long-term capital commitment that enabled increasingly large annual budgets and grantmaking programs [1] [2]. Annual figures cited in the analyses show a wide range of reported revenues and expenses across the 2010s and 2020s — for example, revenues reported as low as $155.6 million in 2013 and as high as $988.4 million in 2021, and expenses moving from roughly $180.0 million in 2014 to $740.4 million in 2019 — which together point to both episodic surges and steady upward pressure on spending as OSF expanded operations, hired staff, and launched new initiatives [3]. This scale enabled thousands of grants, scholarships, and fellowships to be awarded annually, demonstrating that the organization’s capacity to fund actors across sectors has grown substantially [4] [5].
2. Funding Sources and Founder Contributions — One Major Benefactor, Big Effects
Analysis across sources attributes the lion’s share of OSF capital to founder George Soros, with statements that he has provided over $32 billion to the Foundations since either 1979 or 1984 depending on the account, and organizational asset totals cited at approximately $25 billion in some summaries, underscoring that founder endowments have been central to OSF’s trajectory [2] [6] [7]. Where numbers diverge — $32 billion given vs. $24 billion spent vs. $25 billion in assets — the data imply that Soros’s lifetime giving funded both current programming and the endowment or reserves that support ongoing operations. The concentration of funding around a single primary philanthropist explains rapid programmatic shifts when leadership refocuses priorities and accounts for the capacity for large multi-year commitments in areas such as support for emerging democracies, racial justice, health, and climate-related work [7] [8].
3. What OSF Funds — From Post‑Communist Democracies to Racial Justice and Climate
Over time OSF’s priorities evolved from early investments in scholarships and support for emerging post‑communist democracies to a broader portfolio including access to education and healthcare, racial justice, criminal legal reform, and climate action, reflecting both global political developments and internal strategic shifts [7] [9]. The organizational grant databases and fellowship programs document thousands of awards and multiple fellowship streams — Open Society Fellowships, Soros Equality Fellowship, and Soros Justice Fellowships — that channel increasing annual disbursements into specific issue areas and individual leaders. This diversification shows a strategic move away from concentrated, programmatic aid toward a blend of institutional grants and individual fellowships designed to generate policy and civic impacts in multiple regions [4] [9].
4. Year‑to‑Year Volatility and Growth Rates — The Financial Rhythm
Reported financial time series demonstrate not only growth but volatility, with an average annual change of 10.2% since 2016 cited alongside discrete year spikes such as a reported jump to nearly $1 billion in revenues in 2021 and $1.2 billion in expenditures for 2024; historical lows in the mid‑2010s contrast with much larger budgets later in the decade, suggesting that OSF responds to both internal strategy and external opportunity or need [1] [3]. This pattern is consistent with a foundation that deploys capital unevenly: some years funders commit large sums for multi‑year programs and crisis responses, while other years reflect baseline sustaining operations. The variability complicates simple comparisons of year-to-year generosity but confirms a long-term upward trajectory in absolute scale.
5. Grantmaking Reach and Programmatic Implications — Where Money Translates to Influence
OSF’s grantmaking infrastructure now supports thousands of grants across the United States, Africa, Europe, and Central Asia and leverages national and regional foundations and databases to track awards, which indicates a deliberate institutional build‑out to manage wide geographic reach [4] [7] [5]. The combination of large endowment-like contributions and sizable annual expenditures enables sustained campaigns on complex issues such as criminal legal reform and racial justice, while fellowship programs invest directly in individual leadership development. Stakeholders should note that centralized funding from a single philanthropist enables both agility and concentrated agenda-setting power; the organizational growth documented in these sources shows greater capacity to shape policy debates but also raises questions about concentrated influence in civil society [2] [9].