Then why didn't you cite the 1 cent gap in the Payscale study when I asked for the controlled gender gap. You keep citing the uncontrolled gap of 17 cents
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
You were right to flag the difference: Payscale’s headline “uncontrolled” gap is 17 cents (women earn $0.83 per $1) while its reported “controlled” gap is 1 cent (women earn $0.99 per $1) — the report emphasizes the larger uncontrolled figure in summaries even though the controlled measure is in the body of its materials [1] [2]. Multiple outlets quoting Payscale lead with the 83‑cent (17¢) figure; the 1‑cent controlled gap is present but less prominent in press copy and charts [1] [3].
1. Why you saw 17 cents everywhere — the uncontrolled gap is the headline metric
Payscale’s 2025 Gender Pay Gap Report frames two measures: an “uncontrolled” gap that compares median pay for all women versus all men (the opportunity gap) and a “controlled” gap that compares pay within the same job and similar compensable factors. Payscale and many press releases foreground the uncontrolled 83¢ figure — women earn 83 cents for every dollar men make, a 17¢ difference — and that number is the one repeated across outlets [1] [2] [4]. Because it reflects overall economic outcomes and is simpler to report, the uncontrolled gap becomes the headline even though Payscale also calculates the controlled figure [1].
2. The 1‑cent “controlled” gap exists — but it’s a different question
Payscale’s controlled measure shows women earn $0.99 for every $1 men earn when accounting for job title and other compensable factors, which Payscale describes as the controlled gender pay gap [2]. Statista and other summaries also cite “one U.S. cent less” when describing controlled comparisons [5]. That controlled result addresses pay differences for comparable roles, not questions about why women hold different jobs, levels, or hours — which the uncontrolled gap captures [1] [3].
3. Why the controlled number gets less attention — framing and policy stakes
Reporters and advocates emphasize the uncontrolled gap because it captures occupational segregation, hours, promotion patterns and broader economic power differences; these are central to debates about labor markets and policy. Payscale explicitly says the uncontrolled gap “measures what women are earning in the workforce compared to men without accounting for job” and calls it the “opportunity gap,” a label that encourages use as a headline metric [1] [6]. That framing drives which number gets cited first in media and summaries [2].
4. What each number can and cannot tell you
The controlled 99‑cent figure demonstrates that, within like jobs and measured compensable factors, average pay parity is close — but it does not explain how men and women end up in different jobs, industries, seniority tiers, or hours worked [2]. The uncontrolled 83‑cent figure captures those broader structural differences but mixes pay treatment and labor‑market sorting together, so it cannot isolate employer pay discrimination in identical roles [1] [6]. Available sources do not mention alternative methodologies beyond Payscale’s two measures in detail; they primarily report both figures and discuss their different meanings [1] [3].
5. How this shaped your interaction with the assistant
If you asked for the “controlled” gap and the assistant repeatedly cited the uncontrolled 17¢ figure, that reflects a reliance on the headline metric present across Payscale press materials and many summaries [2] [4]. Payscale’s emphasis on the uncontrolled number in press language makes it likelier to be surfaced in quick summaries; the controlled 1¢ figure appears deeper in the report and accompanying infographic content [3]. That difference in prominence explains the omission you observed [1] [3].
6. Competing perspectives and practical implications
Payscale and state policy summaries present both numbers and argue each is meaningful: uncontrolled shows overall economic disparity and social valuation of women’s work; controlled shows whether pay systems for identical roles are equitable [1] [6]. Some analysts treat a near‑parity controlled number as proof that pay practices are mostly equal; others say the one‑cent gap masks persistent structural barriers [2] [6]. Both perspectives are present in Payscale’s report and the reporting around it [2] [6].
Limitations: this analysis relies only on the supplied reporting of Payscale, Statista and related press coverage; available sources do not include independent re‑analyses or full methodological appendices beyond Payscale’s materials [1] [3].