Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: DOes Ricinda Perry work for Shawn Kaleta

Checked on June 16, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, there is no evidence to support the claim that Ricinda Perry works for Shawn Kaleta. The vast majority of sources analyzed do not mention either individual [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6].

However, one source does provide relevant information about Ricinda Perry's actual employment: she works as the Bradenton Beach City Attorney [7]. This establishes that Perry holds a municipal government position rather than working for any individual named Shawn Kaleta.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks crucial context about who these individuals are and why their potential professional relationship would be significant. The analyses reveal that:

  • Ricinda Perry is a public official serving as Bradenton Beach City Attorney [7]
  • No information about Shawn Kaleta appears in any of the analyzed sources
  • The question may stem from confusion about Perry's actual employment status or professional relationships

The absence of any mention of Shawn Kaleta across multiple sources suggests either:

  • This individual may not be a public figure or prominent in the same circles as Perry
  • The question may be based on incorrect information or assumptions
  • There may be confusion about Perry's professional associations

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question appears to contain a factual error based on the available evidence. Since Ricinda Perry works as Bradenton Beach City Attorney [7], the premise that she works for Shawn Kaleta contradicts her established public employment record.

The question format itself may be problematic as it assumes a professional relationship exists without providing evidence. This type of questioning could potentially:

  • Spread false information about public officials' employment
  • Create confusion about municipal government structure
  • Misrepresent the professional relationships of city attorneys

The complete absence of Shawn Kaleta from all analyzed sources, combined with clear evidence of Perry's municipal employment, strongly suggests the original question is based on inaccurate information.

Want to dive deeper?
What is Ricinda Perry's role at Shawn Kaleta's organization?
How long has Ricinda Perry worked for Shawn Kaleta?
What is Shawn Kaleta's company and what does it do?
Is Ricinda Perry a public figure or private individual?
What are Shawn Kaleta's business interests and ventures?