Has rosabella moringa filed annual reports or company filings with public registries?
Executive summary
Available public sources show Rosabella Moringa is sold through consumer-facing websites (tryrosabella.com, getrosabella.com, itsrosabella.com) and lists a U.S. business address under Ambrosia Brands LLC in Cheyenne, Wyoming (525 Randall Ave Suite 100) on its contact page [1] [2]. None of the provided sources show Rosabella—or Ambrosia Brands LLC as connected to Rosabella—filing annual reports or corporate registry filings in public business registries; available sources do not mention any specific company filings or annual reports (p1_s4; not found in current reporting).
1. Public presence: retail pages, claims and a U.S. address
Rosabella markets its Moringa supplement aggressively through multiple branded domains (tryrosabella.com, getrosabella.com, itsrosabella.com) that include product pages, FAQs and promotional claims about nutrients, benefits and a 90-day guarantee [1] [3] [4]. The site’s contact page lists “Ambrosia Brands LLC” with a Cheyenne, WY address and an email for customer service [2]. Those pages establish a commercial footprint but do not equal formal corporate registry evidence [1] [2].
2. What the consumer reporting ecosystem shows — complaints and third‑party reviews
Consumer-review sites record a mix of positive testimonials and strong complaints: Trustpilot pages show hundreds or thousands of reviews praising effects and customer service on one hand (2,439 reviews noted on a Trustpilot listing) and separate Trustpilot reviewers reporting billing, subscription-cancellation and refund problems on another listing [5] [6]. The BBB’s Scam Tracker records a Rosabella Moringa scam entry dated April 10, 2025, indicating consumer reports of suspected fraudulent billing or marketing tactics [7]. These sources show active consumer interaction but do not document corporate filings [5] [6] [7].
3. Investigative signals vs. official filings — a gap in public registry evidence
Independent articles and blog posts scrutinizing Rosabella’s claims and marketing practices note aggressive promotion, unverified health claims, and marketing via spammy channels; one analysis explicitly warns that product manufacturing in an “FDA-registered facility” does not mean FDA approval of the product itself [8]. However, these critiques focus on marketing, manufacturing claims and consumer experience; they do not provide copies or citations of corporate annual reports or registry filings for Rosabella or Ambrosia Brands LLC [8]. Therefore, the specific question of whether Rosabella or its cited company has filed annual reports with public registries remains unanswered in the available reporting (not found in current reporting).
4. On why registry filings might be absent from these sources
Public-company filings (annual reports, SEC filings) or state-level LLC annual reports typically appear in government databases or are referenced in investigative reporting. The materials provided here are mostly commercial, review and consumer-complaint pages; such pages rarely reproduce state registry documents or SEC exhibits. Consequently, absence of a filing in these sources does not prove no filings exist — it means the available reporting does not cite or reproduce them (not found in current reporting; [1]; p1_s4).
5. How to verify filings directly (actionable next steps)
To confirm filings, search the relevant government registries directly: the Wyoming Secretary of State business search for Ambrosia Brands LLC and any “Rosabella” trade names; the U.S. SEC EDGAR database for public company filings if Rosabella or an affiliate were publicly listed; and other state registries if the company operates elsewhere. The sources supplied do not contain those registry checks or results, so they cannot answer the filing question themselves (not found in current reporting; p1_s4).
6. Competing perspectives and hidden agendas in the available reporting
Promotional sites present strong benefit claims, fast results and a satisfaction guarantee [1] [4] [3]. Consumer-protection and review sites raise billing and subscription disputes and flag scam reports [6] [7]. An anti-scam blog frames the product as aggressively marketed with exaggerated benefits [8]. These conflicting perspectives suggest a commercial agenda on brand pages and a consumer-protection agenda on review and watchdog pages; none of these sources supply formal registry filings to settle the corporate‑status question [1] [4] [6] [8] [7].
Limitations: reporting provided here includes company web pages, review sites and a few third‑party critiques; it does not include government business‑registry searches, SEC filings, or copies of annual reports. Therefore, I cannot assert whether formal annual reports exist — only that the supplied sources do not show them (not found in current reporting).