What public records or filings exist for Rose Lake Capital LLC and eStCru/ESTCRU LLC that detail ownership and financial statements?
Executive summary
Congressional financial-disclosure forms filed by Representative Ilhan Omar provide the clearest publicly available statements that name Rose Lake Capital LLC and eStCru/ESTCRU LLC and give broad value ranges and reported income, but those disclosures are categorical ranges rather than underlying audited ownership documents or detailed financial statements [1] [2]. Corporate registry snippets, commercial data vendors and company marketing materials exist in the public record, yet none of the provided sources contain traditional, audited balance sheets or ownership ledgers for the two LLCs [3] [4] [5].
1. What federal public filings show: congressional financial disclosures
The single most direct public filing that mentions both entities is Representative Omar’s annual financial-disclosure form, which lists ESTCRU LLC (also styled eStCru/eStCru LLC) and Rose Lake Capital LLC with asset value ranges and reported income brackets — for example, a 2024 filing shows Rose Lake Capital valued at $5,000,001–$25,000,000 and ESTCRU at $1,000,001–$5,000,000 with specified income ranges for the reporting year [1] [6]. Older disclosure forms show different reported ranges — Rose Lake was listed in 2022 at $1–$1,000, demonstrating that the disclosure entries are self-reported estimates and change year to year [2].
2. What state and corporate registry records indicate (limited detail)
Reporting by Forbes and follow-up press indicates Rose Lake Capital has incorporation history touching Delaware and Washington, D.C., and that D.C. registration records showed revocation while Delaware records showed cancellation for unpaid taxes — specific dollars cited were small tax balances in state filings — but the provided sources do not embed the full state-corporate filing documents themselves in the public reporting furnished here [5]. These accounts imply public corporate-registration records exist but, in the materials supplied, the underlying certificates, operating agreements or ownership filings are not reproduced [5].
3. What commercial business databases and corporate websites provide
Commercial business-data services — Dun & Bradstreet, ZoomInfo and Datanyze — list Rose Lake Capital LLC and provide contact, industry classification and fee-based financial estimates; these entries are public-facing summaries that require subscription or vendor access for detailed underlying reports and are not equivalent to audited statements or ownership ledgers [3] [7] [8]. Rose Lake’s own marketing website presents a company profile and claims about expertise and services but does not publish audited financial statements or detailed ownership breakdowns in the public materials cited here [4].
4. What investigative reporting and secondary sources add — and their limits
Multiple news outlets have parsed the congressional disclosure and highlighted apparent valuation jumps and small bank/cash figures reported in separate coverage — for example, a Rhode Island Current story cited nominal cash balances for Rose Lake Capital and ESTCRU, and other outlets flagged discrepancies between valuation ranges and reported income [9] [10] [11]. These reports rely primarily on the congressional disclosure and selective state-record checks; they do not substitute for corporate operating agreements, audited financials, or certified ownership documents, and the sources provided here do not include those primary corporate filings.
5. What is not present in the provided public record
The assembled reporting and commercial profiles in the supplied sources do not include audited balance sheets, formal ownership ledgers, LLC operating agreements, tax returns, SEC filings, or bank statements for either Rose Lake Capital LLC or eStCru/ESTCRU LLC; where state registry issues are reported (e.g., revocations or tax cancellations) the primary registry documents are referenced in news reporting but are not reproduced here, so firm confirmation of ownership percentages or detailed financial statements is not available in these sources [5] [3] [4].
6. How to pursue documentary proof beyond what’s publicly summarized
To obtain the granular ownership and financial records that the current public summaries do not contain would typically require: pulling state corporate filings and certificates of formation in Delaware and D.C. (and any California filings for the winery), requesting or subpoenaing tax returns or audited financial statements (if they exist and are not privately held), or locating any regulatory filings if the entities ever registered securities publicly — none of which are present in the provided materials, so the reporting here can confirm only that congressional disclosures, commercial profiles and company web copy are the available public traces [1] [3] [4] [5].