Which Substack publishers have significant sponsorship or investor income beyond subscription figures?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Public reporting shows that a subset of headline Substack publishers supplement subscription revenue with brand sponsorships or outside investment, but the ecosystem’s privately negotiated deals and Substack’s recent pivot to a controlled sponsorship pilot mean firm, comprehensive lists of who earns materially from sponsors or investors do not exist in the public record [1] [2] [3]. Evidence points to named examples—most notably Mario Gabriele’s The Generalist and widely cited “top earners” who combine subscriptions with sponsorships—but much of the granular income reporting remains opaque or self-reported by creators [1] [4] [5].
1. The state of play: sponsorships are real, but often informal
Multiple industry write‑ups and platform documentation confirm that many Substack creators already monetize via sponsor placements they negotiate themselves, and Substack has begun formalizing that practice through a limited, opt‑in sponsorship pilot for hand‑selected writers—an acknowledgement that sponsorship income beyond subscriptions is a material part of creator economics even if it’s not centrally tracked by Substack [1] [2] [3].
2. Named publishers with sponsorship histories: The Generalist and Packy as examples, not a roster
Reporting and industry guides single out a few recognizable names as examples of creators who have pursued sponsorships or brand deals—Mario Gabriele’s The Generalist is repeatedly cited as a top business Substack that pursues sponsorship revenue, and commentators reference Packy McCormick among “top writers” who use tasteful sponsorships—these mentions show practice, not total income or exhaustive lists [1].
3. Top earners: aggregate evidence that sponsorships push income into six‑ and seven‑figure territory
Analysts and platform summaries say Substack’s top creators can make six to seven figures annually through a mix of subscriptions, paid posts, and sponsorship deals, and Substack’s top publishers historically generated multi‑million aggregated annualized revenue—indicating sponsorships are one of several levers that push some publishers well beyond subscription receipts alone [4] [5].
4. Platform dynamics: Substack’s funding and a sponsorship product change the incentives
Substack’s funding rounds and investor base—including prominent backers cited across reporting—have coincided with moves toward productizing sponsorships; the company’s fundraising and pilot programs create both the technical route and economic incentive for larger creators to formalize sponsor income beyond direct subscriptions [6] [7] [8] [3].
5. Who’s likely to have significant non‑subscription income (based on available signals)
The strongest public signals that a Substack publisher has significant sponsorship or investor income are: being named as a “top” Substack with multimillion payouts, public discussion of sponsorship deals or ad experiments by the creator (as with The Generalist), or explicit inclusion in Substack’s pilot programs—yet the sources do not publish a comprehensive list of such creators, and many deals remain privately negotiated and selectively disclosed [5] [1] [9] [2].
6. Limits, alternative viewpoints and hidden incentives
Coverage warns that while sponsorships broaden income, Substack long resisted advertising and its new pilot is intentionally limited and creator‑controlled—observers argue this preserves editorial control while also addressing investor pressure to monetize, so motives range from creator diversification to platform investor returns; the reporting does not provide full transparency into individual deal sizes or which creators are part of the pilot beyond hand‑picked participants [5] [2] [10].
7. What can be asserted confidently and what remains unknown
It is certain that sponsorship income exists on Substack and that some named publishers (e.g., The Generalist; commentators cite Packy McCormick) have pursued sponsorships, and that top creators can earn six to seven figures combining revenue streams; it is not possible from the available reporting to produce a verified, exhaustive roster of publishers with “significant” sponsor or investor income because deal terms and participation are often private or selectively disclosed [1] [4] [5] [2].