How do employer eligibility rules differ between Canada's Temporary Foreign Worker Program and the Immigrant Wage Subsidy?

Checked on November 26, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Canada’s Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP) lets employers hire foreign nationals for temporary jobs when qualified Canadians or permanent residents are not available and requires a Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA) with prevailing-wage and recruitment obligations [1] [2]. Wage‑subsidy programs for hiring immigrants exist across federal/provincial programs, but those subsidies are distinct from the TFWP and are available for Canadian citizens as well as immigrants — amounts cited in coverage include typical subsidies of C$5,000–C$10,000 in specific programs, not a blanket employer “kickback” tied to TFWP hiring [3] [4].

1. Two different policy families: immigration permits vs wage‑subsidy programs

The TFWP is an immigration‑focused program administered by Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) in partnership with Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC); it authorizes employers to hire temporary foreign workers where Canadians aren’t available and uses LMIAs to assess impact on the labour market [1] [2]. By contrast, wage‑subsidy initiatives referenced in the media are delivered through various federal or provincial programs (for example, student placement subsidies or Foreign Credential Recognition projects) and aim to support hiring, training or credential recognition — they are not payment mechanisms built into the TFWP LMIA process [3] [4].

2. Employer eligibility and obligations under the TFWP

Employers seeking to hire through the TFWP must demonstrate recruitment efforts, meet prevailing‑wage requirements and, for many streams, obtain a positive LMIA showing the job won’t harm the Canadian labour market [1] [5]. Recent rule changes tightened low‑wage caps, shortened LMIA validity, added regional restrictions (e.g., not processing low‑wage LMIAs in CMAs with ≥6% unemployment) and raised high‑wage thresholds — all measures that make employer access to foreign workers more conditional [6] [7] [2].

3. How wages and thresholds shape employer access

TFWP stream classification (high‑wage vs low‑wage) depends on provincial/territorial wage thresholds; recent policy raised the high‑wage threshold (20% above provincial median) and requires paying the posted prevailing wage for the occupation and location — employers must reflect additional skills/experience in offered wages [7] [5]. These wage rules are designed to prevent displacement of Canadian workers and reduce incentives to underpay when hiring foreign nationals [5] [7].

4. Employer eligibility for wage‑subsidy programs is program‑specific

Wage subsidies cited in fact‑checking coverage (e.g., Student Work Placement Program, Foreign Credential Recognition) have their own eligibility rules that often focus on the type of hire (students, recently arrived skilled newcomers), project objectives, and employer or sector qualifications — and importantly, citizens and permanent residents can also qualify for many subsidies [3] [4]. Reporting warns social posts conflating a generalized employer “kickback” for hiring migrants with these targeted subsidies are misleading because the subsidies are separate programs with limited scopes and amounts [3] [4].

5. Where confusion and political narratives intersect

Fact‑checkers identify a common conflation: social media posts claim a generic government “30% kickback” to employers who hire immigrants. AFP and The Canadian Press found that such claims omit context and misattribute program specifics — some subsidies of C$5,000–C$7,000 (or isolated onboarding subsidies up to C$10,000) exist within particular programs, but they are not automatic payments tied to TFWP LMIAs and are often available to employers hiring citizens too [3] [4]. That distinction matters because it changes the policy implication from an immigration payment to targeted labour‑market or training investments [3].

6. Recent policy tightening and its impact on employer options

Since 2024–2025 the federal government has tightened TFWP eligibility: caps on low‑wage TFWs were reduced (from 30% to 20% and in many sectors to 10%), LMIA validity shortened, and regional moratoria for low‑wage LMIAs were introduced; the 2025–2027 Levels Plan and subsequent guidance also anticipate lower TFWP entries, affecting employer reliance on foreign workers [6] [2] [8]. Employers now face higher wage floors and stricter recruitment tests before LMIA approval [7] [6].

7. Takeaway for employers and the public

If you’re an employer comparing pathways, use the TFWP when you need to hire a temporary foreign worker and can meet LMIA and wage/recruitment rules [1] [5]. If you’re seeking financial support for hiring or training, check specific wage‑subsidy program rules: many are time‑limited, sectoral, and available for hiring Canadians and newcomers alike — they are not a general subsidy attached to every TFWP hire [3] [4]. Available sources do not mention a universal percentage‑of‑pay subsidy tied to TFWP hires; claims that such a blanket “kickback” exists are contradicted by the program distinctions and fact checks above [3] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the employer eligibility criteria for Canada's Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP) vs the Immigrant Wage Subsidy (IWS)?
How do recruitment and Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA) requirements differ from IWS employer obligations?
Can employers simultaneously use the TFWP and the Immigrant Wage Subsidy for the same position or worker?
What documentation and compliance checks must employers pass for TFWP compared to IWS audits and reporting?
How do wage, occupational and sector eligibility rules differ between TFWP streams and the Immigrant Wage Subsidy program?