Has the Trump Organization appealed the New York civil fraud ruling?

1. The immediate post-judgment appeal: notices filed and bond posted

Following Judge Arthur Engoron’s February 2024 bench judgment finding the Trump Organization and named individuals liable in the civil fraud case, the defendants’ lawyers filed notices of appeal to the mid-level New York appellate court and posted a bond to stay collection of the monetary judgment while the appeals proceeded — a standard appellate tactic that the Trump side employed to block immediate enforcement of the nearly half‑billion dollar award ^{[1] [4]}.

2. Multiple appellate steps: from the Appellate Division to the Court of Appeals

The litigation did not stop at the first appeal: reporting and court filings show the Trumps and the Trump Organization sought review at the Appellate Division and, as the dispute evolved, indicated and in some instances filed notices toward New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals — a pathway public reporting tied to filings by Trump and his co‑defendants in mid‑2024 and later moves after the Appellate Division’s 2025 decision ^{[2] [3] [5]}.

3. What the appeals courts did and how the Organization responded

In August 2025 a divided Appellate Division threw out the roughly $450–$500 million fine as excessive while leaving the underlying fraud findings and many injunctive remedies intact; that ruling explicitly left room for further review by the Court of Appeals and prompted both sides to signal or lodge additional appeals — the Attorney General saying she would seek review and Trump’s camp continuing to challenge the remaining judgments and limitations ^{[6] [3] [5]}.

4. Why this is litigation strategy, not a one‑time filing

The pattern in the record is not a single appeal but a layered appellate strategy: initial notices to the Appellate Division, tactical moves to stay enforcement with a bond, contemporaneous filings and signals toward the state’s highest court, and follow‑on appeals and statements after the Appellate Division’s partial victory — all consistent with commercial litigants and high‑stakes defendants seeking to preserve rights while attempting to narrow or overturn adverse rulings ^{[1] [4] [3]}.

5. Competing narratives and what the sources reveal

Coverage differs in emphasis: some outlets frame the appeals as routine legal defense (noting bonds and procedural filings), while partisan statements celebrate or decry the appellate outcomes — for example, Republican officials hailed the appellate decision as vindication while the Attorney General’s office framed appellate law as leaving intact core liability and promising further appeals ^{[7] [3] [5]}. Reporting shows the appeals are procedurally active and ongoing, though precise pendency and every discrete filing after August 2025 are not fully reconstructed in the sources provided here ^{[3] [8]}.

6. Bottom line and limits of reporting

The bottom line in the available record is unmistakable: the Trump Organization has appealed the New York civil fraud rulings — beginning with notices of appeal in 2024 and continuing through appellate proceedings that included the Appellate Division’s August 2025 decision and subsequent further appeals or signals to the New York Court of Appeals ^{[1] [2] [3]}. The sources document the appellate trajectory and public statements from both sides, but the provided reporting does not catalog every procedural filing after August 2025; therefore, while the appellate campaign is clearly established, a complete docket history beyond the cited milestones is not available here ^{[3] [5]}.