Which Trump Organization properties have liens or judgments recorded against them and what do the public land records show?
Executive summary
A New York court judgment finding widespread fraud by Donald Trump and the Trump Organization has been registered as a judgment in at least one county — Westchester — and that registration places liens on Trump Organization properties located in that county, including Trump National in Briarcliff Manor, according to county filings and reporting [1]. The broader court rulings and enforcement posture signal that other Trump-owned assets tied to the judgment could be subject to liens, seizure or transfer restrictions, but public land-record evidence beyond the Westchester filings in the provided reporting is limited and often reflects potential, not yet completed, enforcement actions [2] [3] [4].
1. What the state judgment and county filings actually show
New York Attorney General Letitia James obtained a civil fraud judgment against Trump and his companies, and the AG’s office moved to register that judgment with the Westchester County clerk — a step that “effectively places a lien” on Trump properties in Westchester County, as reported by lohud.com and county officials, meaning the judgment is now a recorded encumbrance in Westchester land records [1]. The lohud report specifically names Trump National in Briarcliff Manor as an asset tied to the county action and notes the judge’s ruling relied in part on inflated valuations of Westchester properties [1]. Registering a judgment in a county creates the basic legal mechanism for lien enforcement there; the public land records in Westchester therefore reflect the AG’s recorded judgment against the defendant entities for properties located in that jurisdiction [1].
2. Which specific properties are shown in reporting as having liens or being at risk
The reporting available in the provided sources documents the Westchester filing and identifies Trump National Golf Club in Briarcliff Manor among the organization’s Westchester holdings that are now encumbered by a recorded judgment [1]. Beyond Westchester, reporters and analysts have highlighted major Trump real-estate assets — including 40 Wall Street, Trump Tower, and the Seven Springs estate outside New York City — as entities likely vulnerable to loss of control or liens if the judgment is enforced, but that framing comes from legal analysis of the court ruling rather than explicit county-record filings in the provided sources [4]. The court’s summary judgment and subsequent enforcement steps underpin the risk to those assets, yet the provided public-record reporting confirms recorded liens in Westchester specifically, not a catalog of county-level land-record liens across all Trump properties [2] [4].
3. What public land records do and do not show, per the cited reporting
Public land records operate at the county level: registering a state-court judgment in a county clerk’s office creates a lien that is publicly searchable in that county’s records, which is exactly what the AG did in Westchester and what the lohud.com report documents [1]. The provided sources do not include a comprehensive, county-by-county search of land records for every Trump Organization property, so reporters can confirm a Westchester lien from filings, while other properties remain described as legally exposed by the judge’s findings without corresponding cited land-record entries in these sources [1] [2]. Legal commentators and PBS note the practical enforcement tools the state has — levies, property liens, garnishment — and that those steps are the standard mechanics for satisfying a civil money judgment, but the PBS piece describes potential enforcement outcomes rather than listing additional recorded liens in public land records beyond Westchester [3].
4. How court orders and related rulings shape future land-record entries
The judge imposed remedies aimed at preventing asset transfers and ordered oversight measures — including an independent monitor and restrictions on sales or transfers without court approval — which limit the defendant entities’ ability to move properties out of reach and create a legal basis for additional liens or recordable restrictions if the AG pursues enforcement in other counties [5] [2]. That judicial architecture explains why commentators single out flagship assets like Trump Tower, 40 Wall Street and Seven Springs as particularly exposed, even where county land records for those properties are not included in the cited reporting [4]. The distinction matters: the court ruling creates the judgment and the legal path to liens; county clerks’ land records are the concrete place those liens appear when registered, and the only explicit public-record filing cited in these sources is the Westchester registration [1] [3].