Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Has the Postal Service ever had delayed pay during past shutdowns (e.g., 2013, 2018-2019)?
Executive Summary
The evidence assembled shows that the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) generally continued operations and paid employees on schedule during major federal shutdowns such as 2013 and 2018–2019, because it is funded through postage and services rather than annual appropriations. At the same time, federal court rulings and Department of Labor findings confirm that many federal employees experienced delayed pay during those shutdowns and that separate, non-shutdown payroll glitches have affected thousands of postal workers at other times.
1. What people actually asserted — separating the competing claims and the heart of the dispute
Analyses of the supplied materials extract two competing claims: first, that the USPS did not have delayed pay in past shutdowns because it is an independent, self-funded agency and continued to operate, so postal employees were paid normally; second, that many federal employees—and potentially some postal workers—did experience delayed pay tied to government shutdowns or other payroll problems. The first claim is stated directly by union and USPS-focused summaries that emphasize the Service’s independence and operational continuity [1] [2]. The second claim rests on a 2020 court decision and Department of Labor reporting that document delayed pay for federal employees during shutdowns and payroll glitches affecting postal carriers, respectively [3] [4].
2. The mainstream administrative view — why the Postal Service is treated differently in shutdowns
Multiple summaries state the Postal Service is an independent entity funded by sales rather than annual appropriations, meaning it is not subject to the same lapse-of-appropriations rules that force other federal agencies to furlough staff or delay pay during a shutdown. This structural funding difference explains why USPS operations and regular paychecks have generally continued during past shutdowns; the union guidance and informational briefs repeatedly underline that mail services remained open and employees reported to work [2] [5]. Those materials also note exceptions and indirect effects—such as economic impacts and administrative complications—that could alter payroll timing even without an appropriations lapse [1].
3. Court rulings and the recorded experience of non-postal federal employees during shutdowns
A 2020 court decision allowed federal employees to pursue claims for unpaid work during the 2018–2019 shutdown and referenced similar litigation tied to 2013, finding that government nonpayment could be subject to legal challenge under labor laws. That ruling confirms that many federal employees experienced delayed pay or unpaid work during those shutdowns, and tens of thousands opted into litigation seeking damages [3]. The decision does not assert that USPS employees broadly were unpaid because of shutdowns; rather, it documents the broader federal-employee experience and legal recourse for delayed pay resulting from appropriations lapses.
4. Administrative guidance from 2018–2019: retroactive pay and off-cycle payments for affected federal employees
Operational guidance issued around the 2018–2019 lapse outlined mechanisms to deliver back pay after funding resumed, including off-cycle payments for initial pay periods affected and subsequent reconciliations. These administrative procedures demonstrate that when pay was delayed for appropriated employees, agencies used retroactive payments to make whole affected staff once funding resumed [6]. The guidance documents the practicalities of correcting delayed pay for appropriated employees, reinforcing the pattern that appropriated federal workers—distinct from most USPS staff—faced payment disruptions and subsequent remediation steps.
5. Payroll glitches and non-shutdown interruptions that hit postal workers separately
Independent of shutdowns, postal-specific payroll failures have occurred: Department of Labor reporting and union statements documented a payroll “glitch” leaving tens of thousands of rural carriers unpaid in 2023 and acknowledged recurring pay-period errors for non-career carriers. These incidents show that postal employees can suffer delayed pay for technical or administrative reasons even when a shutdown is not the cause [4] [1]. Union notices have separately identified unrelated accounting center programming issues that delayed retroactive salary adjustments, underscoring that operational problems at USPS accounting systems can produce pay delays distinct from the appropriations process [1].
6. Bottom line: how to reconcile the threads and where uncertainty remains
Putting the evidence together: the USPS’s funding model insulated most postal pay from shutdown-driven delays in 2013 and 2018–2019, and official guidance and union communications reflect that continuity [2] [5]. At the same time, court rulings and administrative back-pay frameworks confirm that many appropriated federal employees experienced delayed pay during those same shutdowns [3] [6]. Separate payroll failures unrelated to shutdowns have intermittently delayed pay for postal workers, particularly non-career rural carriers, demonstrating that pay disruptions of postal employees can and do occur for reasons other than funding lapses [4] [1]. Remaining uncertainties include precise counts of any USPS employees who may have experienced shutdown-related pay timing issues and the evolving outcomes of litigation and remediation efforts tied to back pay; those specifics are not fully resolved in the supplied materials [3] [6].