How did employers and unions negotiate wages in 2025 in response to inflation?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Employers and unions in 2025 responded to inflation with a mix of across‑the‑board raises, indexed minimum‑wage adjustments, targeted bargaining “openers,” and larger negotiated contract wins in high‑profile sectors. National measures show private compensation rising about 3.5–3.6% year‑over‑year by September 2025 while some employer pay‑budget surveys and union contracts targeted roughly 3.9–20% (or far higher in specific settlements), and many local minimum wages were indexed to inflation [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Wage headlines: modest national increases, sharper local and contract gains
Federal data show wages and salaries rose 3.6% over the 12 months ending September 2025 and total employer compensation climbed roughly 3.5%, producing only small inflation‑adjusted gains (0.5–0.6%) depending on sector [1]. Employers’ planned base‑pay budgets for 2025 clustered near 3.9–4.0% in private surveys, signaling that corporate pay increases broadly tracked — but rarely exceeded by large margins — measured inflation [2] [5].
2. Unions pushed for larger, targeted increases and contract language to keep pace
Unions used collective bargaining to press for higher nominal raises, wage re‑openers, and one‑time payments to restore lost purchasing power. Examples include explicit “wage openers” to renegotiate within contract terms, multi‑year deals that offered double‑digit total increases in some cases (e.g., UC technical staff proposals up to 20% over three years), and local union wins with steep percent raises in specific industries [6] [3] [7].
3. Minimum‑wage indexing and local policy filled gaps left by national averages
State and local governments increasingly relied on automatic cost‑of‑living adjustments: by 2025 dozens of cities and several states had inflation‑indexed floors or raised minimums above $15, with multiple localities reaching $17+ and some city ordinances immediately adjusting on Jan. 1 [4]. Those policy moves affected pocketbooks especially at the bottom of the wage distribution where aggregate ECI averages understate variation [4] [1].
4. Strategic employer responses: budgets, lump sums, and compensation planning
Employers balanced base‑pay raises with lump‑sum or accelerated cash payments, and compensation planners forecast median salary budgets near 4.0% while flagging pay transparency and AI hiring effects as complicating factors [5] [8]. Some firms conditioned wage timing or position creation on ratification, and company bargaining pages framed offers as sustainable tradeoffs between cash now and longer‑term commitments [8].
5. Labour market context: wages broadly outpacing inflation but unevenly
Multiple wage trackers indicated nominal wage growth generally outpaced inflation in much of 2024–25 — e.g., wages grew faster than CPI in several measures and at points by more than a percentage point — yet the gains were narrow and uneven across workers, industries, and regions [9] [10] [11]. Indeed and other trackers warned that many workers saw no real purchasing‑power gain even as averages improved [10].
6. Union leverage and the politics of bargaining in 2025
Union bargaining power produced headline settlements (dockworkers, aerospace, public sector) and an uptick in aggressive campaigns; commentators also noted a changed political and legal terrain that could shape outcomes, including shifts at the NLRB and a more visible public debate about employer profits versus worker pay [12] [7]. Researchers and advocates point to a persistent “union wage premium” — on average higher wages for covered workers — as part of why unionized bargaining remains central to wage responses [13].
7. Two competing narratives: moderation versus catch‑up
One interpretation — voiced by employers and some economists — treats 2025 wage moderation as evidence labor markets are cooling and helping to tame inflation, with modest real gains and lower wage‑driven price pressure [14]. The opposing union and worker narrative emphasizes bargaining campaigns, wage openers, and targeted high‑percent deals as necessary catch‑up to recoup earlier purchasing‑power losses and to raise standards in sectors that saw outsized cost pressures [6] [7].
8. Limits of the available reporting
Available sources document national ECI figures, surveyed employer budgets, local minimum‑wage laws, and a range of union bargains and bargaining strategies, but they do not provide a comprehensive, worker‑level breakdown of who gained or lost in 2025 or exhaustive lists of every contract clause used to index wages to inflation; union success rates and sectoral differences are reported anecdotally or in selective case studies [1] [2] [6] [7]. The evidence shows clear heterogeneity: averages hide substantial distributional differences [10] [14].
Bottom line: In 2025 employers mostly matched measured inflation with planned raises near 3.5–4.0%, while unions pressured for and in many cases won larger or more protective contract language, minimum‑wage indexing and one‑time payments — but outcomes varied sharply by sector, locality, and bargaining strength [1] [2] [6] [4].