Which regions or states saw the highest number of Walmart permanent closures in 2025 and why?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Walmart confirmed a small wave of permanent store shutdowns tied to underperformance and local market dynamics that, across multiple reports, were concentrated most heavily in California in 2025, with additional closures scattered in Georgia, Maryland, Ohio, Wisconsin and Colorado [1] [2] [3]. That narrative is complicated by Walmart’s public statement that it had no broad plan to close stores in 2025 and by inconsistent reporting among outlets, forcing a cautious reading of the lists and motives [4] [5].
1. California emerged as the hotspot, by several tallies
Multiple compilations published in late 2024 and early 2025 list California as the state with the largest share of the small set of permanent Walmart closures—reports commonly cite five California locations among roughly 11 total store shutdowns—making California the region with the highest number of closures in these available lists [1] [2] [6].
2. A smattering of closures across six other states
Beyond California, outlets include Georgia, Maryland, Ohio, Wisconsin and Colorado among states that saw confirmed or widely reported Walmart shutdowns in 2025, with examples named in press roundups such as Towson, MD; Columbus, OH; Milwaukee, WI; Aurora, CO; and Georgia suburban sites—these lists add up to roughly 11 total closures in the coverage examined [3] [5] [2].
3. The stated reasons: local underperformance, oversaturation and portfolio reshaping
Reporting synthesizes Walmart’s rationale as conventional retail triage: individual stores “hav[ing]n’t met financial expectations,” lower-than-forecast sales, proximity of multiple stores cannibalizing traffic, and high operating costs in certain local markets—reasons repeated across summaries and attributed to Walmart executives or company statements [5] [7] [3].
4. Corporate strategy beyond closures: reinvestment in other formats and remodels
At the same time Walmart has been explicit about reallocating resources: expanding fuel-and-convenience sites and Neighborhood Market formats, opening new supercenters in select regions, and remodeling hundreds of stores as part of a “stores of the future” program—context that companies use to frame selective closures as strategic redeployment rather than systemic retrenchment [4] [6] [5].
5. A conflicting corporate line: “no plans to close any stores in 2025” and how that alters interpretation
Fast Company reported a direct denial from Walmart saying it had “no current plans to close any stores in 2025” and that many circulating lists conflated stores closed in 2024 with alleged 2025 shutdowns, a correction the company pressed after media republication of an earlier list [4]. This corporate pushback means some of the closure tallies in secondary outlets may mix past closures with planned changes, so the exact state-by-state counts in open-source lists should be treated cautiously [4] [8].
6. What can reasonably be concluded from the available reporting
Based on the files and compilations that circulated in early-to-mid 2025, California consistently appears as the state with the highest number of permanent Walmart closures in that reporting set, followed by isolated closures in Georgia, Maryland, Ohio, Wisconsin and Colorado; however, Walmart’s own statements and the patchwork nature of the reporting limit certainty about timing and intent, and some outlets likely repeated 2024 closures or unverified lists as 2025 actions [1] [2] [4] [5].
7. Caveats, alternative readings and where reporting may have agendas
Many of the articles reproducing lists (including international aggregators and local news roundups) emphasize shuttered hometown stores and community impact—an angle that drives clicks—while Walmart’s corporate framing stresses investment and remodels; independent scrutiny is needed because some outlets did not confirm each closure with Walmart before publication and some list items appear to reflect 2024 actions rather than fresh 2025 decisions [4] [6] [9].