Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Did Walmart close 154 stores in 2016?

Checked on August 18, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses overwhelmingly confirm that Walmart did close 154 stores in the United States in 2016. Multiple credible news sources, including NBC News, CNBC, and ABC News, consistently report that Walmart announced plans to close 269 stores globally, with 154 of those closures occurring specifically in the U.S. [1] [2].

The closures were part of a broader strategic restructuring by Walmart, which included shuttering all 102 of its small-format Express stores [3]. The 154 U.S. store closures were spread across 27 states, with many of the affected locations being in small towns [4] [5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks several important contextual elements that provide a fuller picture of Walmart's 2016 store closure strategy:

  • Global scope: While the question focuses only on U.S. closures, Walmart's decision was part of a larger global restructuring affecting 269 stores worldwide [1] [2]
  • Simultaneous expansion: The closures occurred alongside Walmart's plans to open up to 405 new stores, indicating this was a strategic reallocation rather than simple downsizing [1]
  • Disproportionate impact on small communities: The closures had a particularly devastating effect on small towns, with residents describing the impact as a "double blow" and leaving communities "broken" [6] [4] [5]
  • Strategic rationale: The closures were driven by financial performance issues and long-term strategy shifts, not simply arbitrary cost-cutting [2] [5]
  • Format-specific targeting: The closure of all Express stores represented Walmart abandoning an entire store concept that had failed to meet expectations [3]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself contains no apparent misinformation or bias. It asks a straightforward factual question about a specific number of store closures in a specific year. The question is appropriately narrow in scope and does not contain loaded language or misleading framing.

However, asking only about the U.S. closures without mentioning the global context could potentially lead to an incomplete understanding of Walmart's broader strategic decisions during this period. The question's focus solely on closures, without acknowledging the simultaneous store openings, might also create a misleadingly negative impression of Walmart's overall business trajectory in 2016.

Want to dive deeper?
What were the main reasons for Walmart's 2016 store closures?
How many employees were affected by Walmart's 2016 store closures?
Which states had the most Walmart store closures in 2016?
What was the financial impact of Walmart's 2016 store closures on the company?
How did Walmart's 2016 store closures compare to other major retailers?